Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370135›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2022

Efficacy of the Cervical Vertebral Maturation Method: A Systematic Review.

Alessandra Lucchese, Lars Bondemark, Marco Farronato, Gaia Rubini, Enrico Felice Gherlone, Antonino Lo Giudice, Maurizio Manuelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessment of Cervical Vertebral Maturation and Chronological Age in Yemeni Children and Adolescents Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Bone age and dental age to assess criminal responsibility: Part I.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra LuccheseUnit of Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Unit of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Unit of Dentistry, Research Center for Oral Pathology and Implantology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Lars BondemarkDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmő University, Malmő, Sweden.
Marco FarronatoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gaia RubiniUnit of Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Unit of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Unit of Dentistry, Research Center for Oral Pathology and Implantology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Enrico Felice GherloneUnit of Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Unit of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Unit of Dentistry, Research Center for Oral Pathology and Implantology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario "Vittorio Emanuele - G. Rodolico", Catania, Italy.
Maurizio ManuelliUnit of Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Unit of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Unit of Dentistry, Research Center for Oral Pathology and Implantology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Private Practice Milano, Pavia and Bologna, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present systematic review was carried out to evaluate both qualitatively and quantitatively the effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method in predicting the pubertal growth spurt.

methodsPubMed, PMC, Scopus, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched. The research included every article published from 1970 to June 2019, featuring the keywords: ("cervical vertebrae" OR ("cervical" AND "vertebrae") AND ("orthodontics" OR "growth and development" OR ("growth" AND "development") OR ("growth"). The Preferred Reporting Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was adopted, and quality assessments modified from the "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" (STROBE) and the "Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies" (STARD) were performed to conduct this systematic review.

resultsInitially, 1284 articles were found. All the articles were then examined, and 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen articles had low-quality scores, 25 had moderate scores, and 2 had high scores. The results showed a moderate to high statistically significant correlation between the CVM and other maturation methods.

conclusionOverall, the CVM method can be considered an effective method and may be used with other skeletal indices for the radiographic assessment of skeletal maturity, and also to identify the growth peak in growing patients.

Identifiers

PMID35370135
PMCPMC9128580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.