Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369843›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2022

Who should talk with patients about their end-of-life care wishes? A nationwide survey of the Hungarian population.

Csilla Busa, Eva Pozsgai, Judit Zeller, Agnes Csikos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Csilla BusaInstitute of Primary Health Care, Department of Palliative Care, University of Pecs Medical School, Pecs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6916-1118
Eva PozsgaiInstitute of Primary Health Care, Department of Palliative Care, University of Pecs Medical School, Pecs, Hungary.
Judit ZellerFaculty of Law, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Agnes CsikosInstitute of Primary Health Care, Department of Palliative Care, University of Pecs Medical School, Pecs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3322-9122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the needs and opportunities of the general population to communicate their end-of-life care wishes and to investigate what roles are assigned to healthcare providers and family members in end-of-life care discussions.

designA cross-sectional social survey was carried out in Hungary. Descriptive analysis and analysis of variance were performed.

settingNationwide survey of the Hungarian general population. SUBJECT: The sample (

main outcome measuresNeeds and opportunities of the general population to communicate end-of-life care wishes.

results72% of participants found it important to discuss their end-of-life care wishes with someone. Six out of ten believed that it was also the GPs' task to talk with the patients about their end-of-life care wishes. An almost equal level of engagement was expected from healthcare providers (80%) -especially physicians (72%)- and family members (75%) in end-of-life conversations. However, only 36% of participants felt that there was someone among their healthcare providers, and 56% of them had a family member or friend with whom they could speak openly about death, dying and preparing for death.

conclusionCompared to their needs, the general population had fewer opportunities to speak about death, dying and preparing for death. Training programs for healthcare providers, particularly GPs, and public awareness campaigns may support the broader application of advance care planning in Hungary.Key PointsCurrent guidelines recommend that GPs initiate advance care planning discussions. However, little is known with whom the general population wish to discuss their end-of-life care preferences and with whom there is an opportunity to do so.An almost equal level of engagement was expected from healthcare providers -especially physicians- and family members in end-of-life conversations. Most of the general population thought that participation in end-of-life discussions was also the GPs' task.The majority of participants reported that there was no one among their healthcare providers and a sizable minority felt that there was no one among their family members or friends with whom they could talk openly about death, dying, and preparing for death.The highest levels of unmet needs regarding end-of-life conversations with healthcare providers were found among those who considered it important to discuss their end-of-life care wishes.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTerminal CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDeathHumansHungaryadvance care planningcommunication needs and opportunitiesend-of-life care wishesEnd-of-life conversationfamily membersgeneral populationgeneral practitioners

Identifiers

PMID35369843
PMCPMC9090407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.