Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369678›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research2022

Hemorrhagic Ascites Is Associated With Reduced Survival in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Umair Iqbal, Zohaib Ahmed, Hafsa Anwar, Nihit M Shah, Wade Lee, Ali Nawras, Harshit S Khara, Aijaz Ahmed, Sandeep Khurana

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Umair IqbalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
Zohaib AhmedDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Hafsa AnwarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Capital Health Regional Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Nihit M ShahDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
Wade LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Ali NawrasDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Harshit S KharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
Aijaz AhmedDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sandeep KhuranaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
Geisinger Medical Center · USUniversity of Toledo · USRegional Medical Center · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhagic ascites is characterized as red blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm Methods: We conducted a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry, and Web of Science Core Collection to identify studies till March 2021, which, in patients with cirrhosis, compared outcomes amongst those with hemorrhagic ascites to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality, and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Results: Four studies, with 2,058 cirrhosis patients, were included. Among these, 1,488 patients had non-hemorrhagic ascites and 570 had hemorrhagic ascites. We observed no significant differences in AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 2.55; confidence interval (CI): 0.58 - 11.24), HE (OR = 2.52; CI: 0.70 - 9.05), SBP (OR = 1.66; CI: 0.12 - 22.83) and PVT (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.71 - 1.39). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic ascites compared to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites (OR = 1.79; CI: 1.37 - 2.36; I Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis, hemorrhagic ascites is a poor prognostic marker, which is associated with increased ICU stay and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate significance of hemorrhagic ascites in patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryHepatic encephalopathyIntensive care unitPortal vein thrombosisSpontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Identifiers

PMID35369678
PMCPMC8913017
OpenAlexW4214680987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.