Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369665›Full record

ReviewKidney3602021

Comprehensive Assessment of Fluid Status by Point-of-Care Ultrasonography.

Eduardo R Argaiz, Abhilash Koratala, Nathaniel Reisinger

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Neonatal acute kidney injury: where are we now?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo R ArgaizNational Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-6098
Abhilash KoratalaMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-3574
Nathaniel ReisingerUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8054-2579
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of complex fluid and electrolyte disorders is central to the practice of nephrologists. The sensitivity of physical examination alone to determine fluid status is limited, precluding accurate clinical decision making. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is emerging as a valuable, noninvasive, bedside diagnostic tool for objective evaluation of physiologic and hemodynamic parameters related to fluid status, tolerance, and responsiveness. Rapid bedside sonographic evaluation can obtain qualitative data on cardiac function and quantitative data on pulmonary congestion. Advanced POCUS, including goal-directed Doppler echocardiography, provides additional quantitative information, including flow velocities and pressures across the cardiac structures. Recently, abnormal Doppler flow patterns in abdominal organs secondary to increased right atrial pressure have been linked to congestive organ damage, adding another component to the hemodynamic assessment. Integrating POCUS findings with clinical and laboratory data can further elucidate a patient's hemodynamic status. This drives decisions regarding crystalloid administration or, conversely, diuresis or ultrafiltration and allows tailored therapy for individual patients. In this article, we provide an overview of the focused assessment of cardiovascular function and pulmonary and venous congestion using POCUS and review relevant literature.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceHumansNephrologistsUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Dopplercongestiondopplerfluid statusheart failurehemodynamicshemodynamics and vascular regulationhypervolemiaPOCUSpoint of care ultrasoundVExUSvolume status

Identifiers

PMID35369665
PMCPMC8676400
OpenAlexW3165931953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.