Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369664›Full record

ReviewKidney3602021

New Frontiers in Vascular Access Practice: From Standardized to Patient-tailored Care and Shared Decision Making.

Mariana Murea, Karen Woo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana MureaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-1691
Karen WooDepartment of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Outcomes of Vascular Dialysis Access in the ElderlyK08DK107934 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WOO, KAREN · 2016 to 2020
$847k
A randomized pilot study comparing graft-first to fistula-first strategies in older patients with incident end-stage kidney diseaseR03AG060178 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MUREA, MARIANA · 2018 to 2019
$233k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG060178NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK107934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular access planning is critical in the management of patients with advanced kidney disease who elect for hemodialysis for RRT. Policies put in place more than two decades ago attempted to standardize vascular access care around the model of optimal, namely arteriovenous fistula, and least preferred, namely central venous catheter, type of access. This homogenized approach to vascular access care emerged ineffective in the increasingly heterogeneous and complex dialysis population. The most recent vascular access guidelines acknowledge the limitations of standardized care and encourage tailoring vascular access care on the basis of patient and disease characteristics. In this article, we discuss available literature in support of patient-tailored access care on the basis of differences in vascular access outcomes by biologic and social factors-age, sex, and race. Further, we draw attention to the overlooked dimension of patient-reported preferences and shared decision making in the practice of vascular access planning. We discuss milestones to overcome as requisite steps to implement effective shared decision making in vascular access care. Finally, we take into consideration local practice cofactors as major players in vascular access fate. We conclude that a personalized approach to hemodialysis vascular access will require dynamic care specifically relevant to the individual on the basis of biologic factors, fluctuating clinical needs, values, and preferences.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous FistulaCentral Venous CathetersDecision Making, SharedHumansPatient PreferenceRenal Dialysisagedialysishemodialysispatient-centered carepatient-reportedracereference standardssexvascular access

Identifiers

PMID35369664
PMCPMC8676387
OpenAlexW3167636658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.