ReviewKidney3602021
New Frontiers in Vascular Access Practice: From Standardized to Patient-tailored Care and Shared Decision Making.
Review in Kidney360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis: Findings from a matched cohort study.The journal of vascular access · 2026Article
- The association between multimorbidity and arteriovenous fistula creation outcomes.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Engaging Dialysis Teams in Shared Decision-Making Conversations With Patients to Improve Rates of Kidney Transplantation.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Patient Perceptions of Vascular Access and Quality of Life in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Study on Patient-Centered Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Rate of Procedures Required to Maintain Hemodialysis Vascular Access: A Data Linkage Analysis.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward training of vascular access in chronic hemodialysis patients among nephrology fellows in Southwest China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Arteriovenous Fistula Placement, Maturation, and Use: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- A collaborative model between dialysis clinics and a hospital center improves the quality of vascular access care and intervention for hemodialysis patients.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- The impact of vascular access type on survival in haemodialysis: time for a paradigm shift? A prospective cohort study.Journal of nephrology · 2023Article
- Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Article
- Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of "CKD-PeriDialysis"-the Periods Prior to and in the Early-Stage of Initial Dialysis.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular access planning is critical in the management of patients with advanced kidney disease who elect for hemodialysis for RRT. Policies put in place more than two decades ago attempted to standardize vascular access care around the model of optimal, namely arteriovenous fistula, and least preferred, namely central venous catheter, type of access. This homogenized approach to vascular access care emerged ineffective in the increasingly heterogeneous and complex dialysis population. The most recent vascular access guidelines acknowledge the limitations of standardized care and encourage tailoring vascular access care on the basis of patient and disease characteristics. In this article, we discuss available literature in support of patient-tailored access care on the basis of differences in vascular access outcomes by biologic and social factors-age, sex, and race. Further, we draw attention to the overlooked dimension of patient-reported preferences and shared decision making in the practice of vascular access planning. We discuss milestones to overcome as requisite steps to implement effective shared decision making in vascular access care. Finally, we take into consideration local practice cofactors as major players in vascular access fate. We conclude that a personalized approach to hemodialysis vascular access will require dynamic care specifically relevant to the individual on the basis of biologic factors, fluctuating clinical needs, values, and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.