ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022
Antiseptics and antimicrobials for the treatment and management of chronic wounds: a systematic review of clinical trials.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive Hydrogel-MOF Composites as Resistance-Modulating Wound Interfaces: Molecular Mechanisms and Rational Design for Chronic Wound Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- M.O.I.S.T. Concept for the Local Therapy of Chronic Wounds: An International Update.The international journal of lower extremity wounds · 2026Review
- Oxygen and ROS Delivery for Infected Wound Healing and Future Prospects.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Carbon nanomaterials: Exploring new frontiers in wound healing therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- A review of advancements in antiseptics for wound care in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Pathophysiology, Immune Dysregulation, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Against Bacteria Isolated from Animal Wounds.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Understanding the pathophysiology ofBurns & trauma · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Keratosept Eye Drops in Patients with Punctate Keratitis: Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation on 50 Eyes.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Review
- Variables Associated with Attitudes toward Biodebridement UsingHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fluorescence - modern method of the diagnosis of chronic wounds on the example of venous leg ulcer.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The development of the field related to the treatment of wounds has resulted in the appearance of new antimicrobial active ingredients. Aim: To analyse, evaluate and systematize the available scientific evidence of the effectiveness and safety of antiseptic preparations intended for the treatment of chronic wounds. Material and methods: We conducted a literature review using the advanced search engine in the PubMed database. We used a combination of two English keywords, i.e.: "antiseptic" and "chronic wound". We have selected only clinical, randomized controlled trials. Results: We obtained a total of 825 items (674 full-text works). We included 29 studies in the review. The most frequently evaluated preparation was octenidine dihydrochloride and povidone iodine (pharmacological drugs). Preparations containing polyhexanide, products based on hypochlorite, reactive oxygen species, 1% acetic acid, and specialized antibacterial dressings were also assessed. The new generation of antimicrobial preparations were highly effective, both in the prevention and treatment of infections, and were well tolerated by the tissues and do not interfere with the healing process. The best tolerated and most effective antiseptic was OCT/PE. For cleaning, we recommend OCT-based irrigation fluids, PHMB, or hypochlorite. The maintenance of the antimicrobial effect during the therapy was ensured by a compatible dressing. Conclusions: An antiseptic alone is not effective enough and the therapeutic effect depends to the greatest extent on properly selected causal therapy, preceded by thorough diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.