ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022
Can genistein be a potential agent against skin side effects associated with the treatment of breast cancer?
Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Insomnia Among Insomnia Patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Nanodelivery Approaches of Phytoactives for Skin Cancers: Current and Future Perspectives.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- The Therapeutic Role of Genistein in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024Review
- Article
- Unconventional Remedies for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Journey into Alternative Treatments.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- The protective activity of genistein against bone and cartilage diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant medical advances, cancer treatment is still associated with a high risk of side effects. The treatment is usually invasive and devastating and it affects the overall immunity of the whole organism, including the condition of the skin. In recent years there has been a growing interest in isoflavonoids, due to their wide range of biological and pharmacological activity, especially estrogen-like. It gives a broad perspective of their use as active ingredients of preparations, which eliminate skin lesions associated with oncological treatment. This article is an overview describing preclinical and clinical observations on the basis of available literature. It discusses the influence of genistein on skin health in women after breast cancer treatment. The overview focuses on studies conducted with genistein
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.