Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369624›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022

"Fine feathers make fine birds" - non-medical students' opinions on the dermatologists' image in Poland: a cross-sectional study.

Irmina Morawska, Beata Bergler-Czop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irmina MorawskaStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Beata Bergler-CzopDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medical professions are full of patterns and personal exemplars which determine norms of behaviour. Research works focused on the doctor's image include not only perception of reality, but also patients' subconscious expectations. Aim: To get to know the students' opinion on the image of dermatologists, to assess the public image of that profession and what factors have the biggest impact on that issue. Material and methods: The study was conducted in a group of 1000 Polish, non-medical students (F = 817, M = 183) between 18 and 25 years old. The data were collected through an anonymous, author-designed, online questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent via Internet social media to students from 12 various non-medical fields of study. Results: 51.6% of interviewees considered this profession as moderately prestigious. Only 18.9% of the respondents saw the image of the dermatologist created by the media as adequately presented. There is a statistically significant difference ( Conclusions: In students' opinion, factors such as medical experience and communication with the patient have the strongest influence on the image of this profession. The second strongest factor affecting the choice of a dermatologist is information acquired by word of mouth from other patients and family members, without any prior verification.

Indexed as

dermatologistdoctorimagenon-medicalstudent

Identifiers

PMID35369624
PMCPMC8953876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.