Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369491›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Bioleaching of Chalcopyrite Waste Rock in the Presence of the Copper Solvent Extractant LIX984N.

Xiaohui Liu, Yuhong Li, Jianfeng Cao, Zhenshun Zeng, Xiaorong Liu, Ruiyong Zhang, Qian Li, Wolfgang Sand

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohui LiuKey Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhong LiBiofilm Centre, Aquatische Biotechnologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jianfeng CaoKey Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenshun ZengKey Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaorong LiuBiofilm Centre, Aquatische Biotechnologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ruiyong ZhangBiofilm Centre, Aquatische Biotechnologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Qian LiKey Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Wolfgang SandBiofilm Centre, Aquatische Biotechnologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Guangzhou University · CNUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEDonghua University · CNShanghai Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heap bioleaching, the solubilization of metal ions from metal sulfides by microbial oxidation, is often combined with solvent extraction (SX) and electrowinning to recover, e.g., copper from low-grade ores. After extraction, the leaching solution is recycled, but the entrained organic solvents may be toxic to the microorganisms. Here

Indexed as

Acidithiobacillusferrooxidansbioleachingchalcopyrite waste rockLeptospirillum ferrooxidansLIX984NSulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans

Identifiers

PMID35369491
PMCPMC8972061
OpenAlexW4220966881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.