Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota of Mongolian Gazelle (

Lupeng Shi, Xiufeng Yang, Huashan Dou, Tianshu Lyu, Lidong Wang, Shengyang Zhou, Yongquan Shang, Yuehuan Dong, Honghai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lupeng ShiCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Xiufeng YangCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Huashan DouHulunbuir Academy of Inland Lakes in Northern Cold & Arid Areas, Hulunbuir, China.
Tianshu LyuCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Lidong WangCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Shengyang ZhouCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Yongquan ShangCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Yuehuan DongCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Honghai ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of man-made facilities such as pasture fences makes the grassland ecosystem fragmented and endangers the survival of local wild animals. The Mongolian gazelle is highly sensitive to hunting and habitat destruction, and is one of the most threatened artiodactyls in Eurasia. It provides a critical model to studying gut microbiota under fragmented habitats. Therefore, we applied metagenomics sequencing to analyze the gut microbiota communities and functions of Mongolian gazelle under fragmented habitats. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in gut microbial communities between the different groups at both the phylum and genus level. The functional analyses showed that the Mongolian gazelle in fragmented habitat had a stronger ability to degrade naphthalene, but their ability to absorb carbohydrates was weaker. This study provided fundamental information about the gut microbiota of Mongolian gazelle, and we recommend reducing habitat fragmentation to better protect the Mongolian gazelle.

Indexed as

fragmented habitatsgut microbiotametagenomicnaphthalene degradationProcapra gutturosa

Identifiers

PMID35369477
PMCPMC8965509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.