Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369402›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Katherine E Ridley-Merriweather, Katharine J Head, Stephanie M Younker, Madeline D Evans, Courtney M Moore, Deidre S Lindsey, Cynthia Y Wu, Sarah E Wiehe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine E Ridley-MerriweatherSusan G. Komen Tissue Bank at the IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, 550 University Blvd., AOC Room 6042, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Katharine J HeadDepartment of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 425 University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Stephanie M YounkerIndiana University School of Medicine, 340 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Madeline D EvansIndiana University School of Medicine, 340 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Courtney M MooreResearch Jam, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, 410 W. 10th. St., suite 2000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Deidre S LindseyHorizon Therapeutics plc, 150 S. Saunders Rd., Lake Forest, IL, 60045, USA.
Cynthia Y WuSusan G. Komen Tissue Bank at the IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, 550 University Blvd., AOC Room 6042, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Sarah E WieheIndiana University School of Medicine, 340 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute · USIndiana University Health · USHorizon Therapeutics (United States) · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring that racial and ethnic minority women are involved in breast cancer research is important to address well-documented current disparities in cancer incidence, stages of diagnosis, and mortality rates. This study used a novel interactive focus group method to identify innovative communication strategies for recruiting women from two minority groups-Latinas and Asian Americans-into the Komen Tissue Bank, a specific breast cancer biobank clinical trial. Through activities that employed visual interactive tools to facilitate group discussion and self-reflection, the authors examined perspectives and motivations for Asian American women (N = 17) and Latinas (N = 14) toward donating their healthy breast tissue. Findings included three themes that, while common to both groups, were unique in how they were expressed: lack of knowledge concerning breast cancer risks and participation in clinical research, cultural influences in BC risk thinking, and how altruism relates to perceived personal connection to breast cancer. More significantly, this study illuminated the importance of using innovative methods to encourage deeper, more enlightened participation among underrepresented populations that may not arise in a traditional focus group format. The findings from this study will inform future health communication efforts to recruit women from these groups into clinical research projects like the Komen Tissue Bank.

Indexed as

Asian AmericanBreast cancerFocus groupHispanicLatinaNovel methods

Identifiers

PMID35369402
PMCPMC8968002
OpenAlexW4220832083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.