Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369396›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2022

Role of Oncology Advanced Practitioners to Enhance Clinical Research.

Christa Braun-Inglis, Leigh M Boehmer, Laura J Zitella, Brianna Hoffner, Yurii B Shvetsov, Jeffrey L Berenberg, Randall A Oyer, Al B Benson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Blazing Trails With Research: Paving the Way for Advanced Practice Providers.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Advanced Practice Role in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christa Braun-InglisUniversity of Hawaii School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Leigh M BoehmerAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland.
Laura J ZitellaUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Brianna HoffnerHarborside, Huntington, New York.
Yurii B ShvetsovUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Jeffrey L BerenbergUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Randall A OyerAnn B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Al B BensonRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oncology advanced practitioners (APs), including nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, and clinical pharmacists contribute significantly to quality cancer care. Advanced practitioners enhance value across the spectrum of cancer care. Research is an underdeveloped component of quality care, as well as an underdeveloped component of AP practice. Understanding research-related attitudes and roles of APs could lead to enhanced clinical trial accrual, conduct, and protocol development. Methods: A nationwide survey addressing attitudes, beliefs, and roles of APs regarding clinical research was distributed by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and Harborside in early 2020. Results: 408 oncology APs completed the survey. Thirty-five percent practice in an academic setting and 62% in the community. Nearly all respondents believe clinical trials are important to improve care, and over 90% report clinical trials are available at their practice. About 80% report being comfortable discussing the topic of clinical trials with patients and are involved in the care of trial participants. Sixty percent are comfortable discussing available trials, and 38% routinely explore available trials with patients. While 70% report approaching eligible patients about trials, only 20% report doing so "a great deal" or "a lot." Ninety percent report that APs should play a role in clinical research, and 73% want to be more involved. Barriers identified to greater AP clinical trial involvement include lack of time, inadequate awareness of trial specifics, and a lack of a formal role in protocol development and leadership. Conclusions: Advanced practitioners are engaged and interested in clinical trials and believe clinical research is important to improve cancer care. Multidisciplinary team integration, trials-related education, and policy change are needed to employ APs to their full potential within cancer clinical trials.

Identifiers

PMID35369396
PMCPMC8955568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.