ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Association Between Circulating Retinol-Binding Protein 4 and Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinol-binding Protein 4 as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- The Adipokine Axis in Heart Failure: Linking Obesity, Sarcopenia and Cardiac Dysfunction in HFpEF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Retinol-binding protein 4 in cardiovascular diseases: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The Potential Role of Retinol-Binding Protein 4 in Heart Failure: A Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Retinol-binding protein 4 in skeletal and cardiac muscle: molecular mechanisms, clinical implications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Long-Term Prognostic Value of Adipocytokines in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An 8-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Visfatin and Retinol Binding Protein-4 in Young-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Lipocalin family proteins and their diverse roles in cardiovascular disease.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The predictive role of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) in the adverse prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been well-defined. We thus conducted this cohort study to investigate the association between circulating RBP4 level and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in Chinese patients with stable CAD. Methods: Patients with stable CAD and serum RBP4 concentration measurement at admission between July 2012 and January 2015 were included. The primary outcome in this study was incident MACEs, which included acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards regression was adopted to investigate the association between RBP4 and the incidence of MACEs. Results: A total of 840 patients with stable CAD were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 61.2 ± 15.9 years, and 56.1% of them were men. After a median follow-up of 2.3 years, 129 MACEs were observed. Compared to participants exposed to the first quartile of serum RBP4 level, those in the second, the third, and the fourth quartiles had associated hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.38 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-4.26], 2.35 (95% CI: 1.31-4.21), and 2.27 (95% CI: 1.28-4.04) after adjusted for confounders, respectively. Every 5 μg/ml increment in serum RBP4 concentration was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.05-1.22) for the occurrence of MACEs. Subgroup analyses suggested no significant modifying effects of baseline characteristics for the association between RBP4 and MACEs in patients with stable CAD. Conclusion: Our finding suggested that the higher circulating RBP4 level was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs in patients with stable CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.