Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

COVID-19 and Stressful Adjustment to Work: A Long-Term Prospective Study About Homeworking for Bank Employees in Italy.

Maria Donata Orfei, Desirée Estela Porcari, Sonia D'Arcangelo, Francesca Maggi, Dario Russignaga, Nicola Lattanzi, Andrea Patricelli Malizia, Emiliano Ricciardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Remote and on-site work stress severity during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparison and selected conditions.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of Working from Home on the Association between Job Demands and Psychological Distress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Donata OrfeiMolecular Mind Laboratory (MoMiLab), IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Desirée Estela PorcariMolecular Mind Laboratory (MoMiLab), IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Sonia D'ArcangeloNeuroscience Lab, Intesa Sanpaolo Innovation Center S.p.A., Turin, Italy.
Francesca MaggiNeuroscience Lab, Intesa Sanpaolo Innovation Center S.p.A., Turin, Italy.
Dario RussignagaIntesa Sanpaolo DC Tutela Aziendale - Sicurezza sul Lavoro ed Ambiente, Turin, Italy.
Nicola LattanziLaboratory for the Analysis of Complex Economic Systems (AXES), IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Andrea Patricelli MaliziaMolecular Mind Laboratory (MoMiLab), IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Emiliano RicciardiMolecular Mind Laboratory (MoMiLab), IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 evolution has forced the massive introduction of homeworking (HW) for most employees in the initial stages of the pandemic and then return to work, mainly due to the vaccination campaign. These multiple abrupt adjustment demands in work may be a source of intense stress for office workers with consequences on wellbeing and the quality of life. This long-term prospective study aimed at investigating the effect of adaptation demands on a broad population of employees of a large Italian banking group in the job-related stress framework. We administered a web-based survey to 1,264 participants in Reopening after the first lockdown, from June to October 2020, at 841 subjects in Second Wave, corresponding to the rise of contagions from November 2020 to January 2021, and to 491 individuals in Vaccination Round, which ranged from February to June 2021. We assessed workaholism by using the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS-10), work-family conflicting overlap by using the Work and Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS), and concern for back to work (BW) and for HW by specific questions. Higher WAFCS scores characterized Reopening and Vaccination Round while Second Wave had the highest level of concern for HW. Women and younger individuals showed the highest concern for BW, WAFCS, and DUWAS-10 scores regardless of the pandemic stage. HW days per week were related to more heightened concern for BW and lower concern for HW, DUWAS, and WAFCS scores. The number of children was related to lower Concern for BW and higher WAFCS scores in Reopening and Second Wave. Our data showed that massive adjustment demands in work and family routine represented a significant source of stress for employees, regardless of the different pandemic stages. The highest level of fatigue emerged in women and younger subjects. These results shed light on the need for a road map to promote a gradual and structured adjustment for workers and encourage organizations to consider homeworking as a valid stable alternative.

Indexed as

COVID-19employeeshomeworkingpandemicstresswork-family conflict

Identifiers

PMID35369135
PMCPMC8970302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.