ArticleHealth policy and technology2022
Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomes.
Article in Health policy and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient perspectives on telehealth access among people experiencing homelessness: a rapid review.International journal for equity in health · 2026Pooled it
- Strategies to improve telehealth access for culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a systematic review.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Neurological Teleconsultations in General Practice: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- The effect of post-discharge education provided via telenursing on the quality of life and functional independence levels of elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Health education research · 2026Trial
- From rural Norway to high-density systems: translating nurse-led emergency models.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Evaluating Telehealth Quality Outcomes of a Pediatric Weight Management Program.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2026Article
- Digital infrastructure and proxies of ambulatory care access in Russia, 2018-2024: a regional panel study with a national telemedicine signal analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Technological and Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing Telemedicine Literacy in Trinidad and Tobago: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Multidimensional Approach.Health science reports · 2025Article
- German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Telehealth use has surged since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the evaluation of telehealth outcomes and performance has not necessarily matched the pace of its uptake. In this article we aim to guide the design of a telehealth evaluation system encompassing all four domains of the outcome measurement framework developed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We aim to achieve this through proposing survey items that can be distributed to patients or clinicians as a questionnaire and providing suggestions on areas of focus for evaluation studies. Methods: Using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, we performed a literature review of articles related to the evaluation of telehealth outcomes that were published in English since 2000. Results: We found existing survey tools to assist the development of an evaluation questionnaire, and categorized items into the four NQF outcome domains. For each outcome domain, we also summarize existing work on evaluation and make recommendations on areas for future assessment. In particular, we found that telehealth accessibility and accommodations have been historically under-studied and provide tools to address this. Conclusions: Evaluating telehealth outcomes is critical to ensure efficient and high-quality care delivery, and we believe establishing an evaluation system will help practices assess and improve their telehealth systems as well as their ability to use telehealth to respond to the diverse needs of patients. Public Interest Summary: Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth use has been on the rise. Evaluating outcomes related to telehealth is critically important, but given the urgency of telehealth uptake, many health systems and practices may not yet have evaluation systems in place. This article guides the design of a telehealth evaluation system by proposing several validated and novel survey questions that can be used as part of a patient or clinician questionnaire and suggesting important measures of outcome for evaluation studies to assess across the four domains of telehealth quality as outlined by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We present tools to reach priority populations who often lack access to remote care, including older adults, underrepresented minorities, and people with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.