Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369128›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and technology2022

Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomes.

Melinda M Li, Kristin L Rising, Elizabeth M Goldberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating Telehealth Quality Outcomes of a Pediatric Weight Management Program.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Melinda M LiA.B. Candidate, Program in Liberal Medical Education, Brown University, Box 4743, 69 Brown St, Providence, RI, USA.
Kristin L RisingMD MS, Associate Professor and Director of Acute Care Transitions, Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth M GoldbergMD, ScM, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine and Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

GAPcare II: The Geriatric Acute & Post-acute Care Coordination Program for Fall Prevention in the Emergency DepartmentK76AG059983 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2024
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Telehealth use has surged since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the evaluation of telehealth outcomes and performance has not necessarily matched the pace of its uptake. In this article we aim to guide the design of a telehealth evaluation system encompassing all four domains of the outcome measurement framework developed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We aim to achieve this through proposing survey items that can be distributed to patients or clinicians as a questionnaire and providing suggestions on areas of focus for evaluation studies. Methods: Using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, we performed a literature review of articles related to the evaluation of telehealth outcomes that were published in English since 2000. Results: We found existing survey tools to assist the development of an evaluation questionnaire, and categorized items into the four NQF outcome domains. For each outcome domain, we also summarize existing work on evaluation and make recommendations on areas for future assessment. In particular, we found that telehealth accessibility and accommodations have been historically under-studied and provide tools to address this. Conclusions: Evaluating telehealth outcomes is critical to ensure efficient and high-quality care delivery, and we believe establishing an evaluation system will help practices assess and improve their telehealth systems as well as their ability to use telehealth to respond to the diverse needs of patients. Public Interest Summary: Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth use has been on the rise. Evaluating outcomes related to telehealth is critically important, but given the urgency of telehealth uptake, many health systems and practices may not yet have evaluation systems in place. This article guides the design of a telehealth evaluation system by proposing several validated and novel survey questions that can be used as part of a patient or clinician questionnaire and suggesting important measures of outcome for evaluation studies to assess across the four domains of telehealth quality as outlined by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We present tools to reach priority populations who often lack access to remote care, including older adults, underrepresented minorities, and people with disabilities.

Indexed as

AccessEvaluationTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35369128
PMCPMC8957891
OpenAlexW4221029395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.