ArticleKidney3602021
Machine Learning for Prediction of Patients on Hemodialysis with an Undetected SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Article in Kidney360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: From Early Detection to Clinical Management of Kidney Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dialysis parameters associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and prognosis in end-stage kidney disease.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection among hemodialysis patients using deep neural network methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A NONPARAMETRIC MIXED-EFFECTS MIXTURE MODEL FOR PATTERNS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH COVID-19.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Predicting mortality risk in dialysis: Assessment of risk factors using traditional and advanced modeling techniques within the Monitoring Dialysis Outcomes initiative.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2023Article
- Predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection among hemodialysis patients using multimodal data.Frontiers in nephrology · 2023Article
- Predictors of shorter- and longer-term mortality after COVID-19 presentation among dialysis patients: parallel use of machine learning models in Latin and North American countries.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Automated diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma from fundus image by simulating human's grading with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Detection of COVID-19 Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Nationwide Chilean Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Modifiable Risk Factors Are Important Predictors of COVID-19-Related Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis.Frontiers in nephrology · 2022Article
- Trajectories of clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients by survival.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We developed a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the risk of a patient on hemodialysis (HD) having an undetected SARS-CoV-2 infection that is identified after the following ≥3 days. Methods: As part of a healthcare operations effort, we used patient data from a national network of dialysis clinics (February-September 2020) to develop an ML model (XGBoost) that uses 81 variables to predict the likelihood of an adult patient on HD having an undetected SARS-CoV-2 infection that is identified in the subsequent ≥3 days. We used a 60%:20%:20% randomized split of COVID-19-positive samples for the training, validation, and testing datasets. Results: We used a select cohort of 40,490 patients on HD to build the ML model (11,166 patients who were COVID-19 positive and 29,324 patients who were unaffected controls). The prevalence of COVID-19 in the cohort (28% COVID-19 positive) was by design higher than the HD population. The prevalence of COVID-19 was set to 10% in the testing dataset to estimate the prevalence observed in the national HD population. The threshold for classifying observations as positive or negative was set at 0.80 to minimize false positives. Precision for the model was 0.52, the recall was 0.07, and the lift was 5.3 in the testing dataset. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) for the model was 0.68 and 0.24 in the testing dataset, respectively. Top predictors of a patient on HD having a SARS-CoV-2 infection were the change in interdialytic weight gain from the previous month, mean pre-HD body temperature in the prior week, and the change in post-HD heart rate from the previous month. Conclusions: The developed ML model appears suitable for predicting patients on HD at risk of having COVID-19 at least 3 days before there would be a clinical suspicion of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.