Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35369005›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022

Validation of Balance Map Analysis of Walking at Different Speeds.

Takahiro Kagawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takahiro KagawaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aichi Institute of Technology, 1247 Yachigusa, Yakusa-cho, Toyota 470-0392, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-1813
Aichi Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking balance about falling in the forward direction is associated with the body's center of mass and placement of the swing foot during the swing phase. Balance map analysis evaluates walking balance based on the prediction of the reachability of an appropriate foot placement using a simple biomechanical model during the swing phase without active joint torque (ballistic walking model). The ballistic walking model can be justified in terms of the preferred walking speed because the metabolic energy consumption associated with muscle activity in faster and slower walking is higher than that in preferred speed walking. Therefore, the assumption that the active joint torque is sufficiently small during the swing phase may not hold in faster or slower walking, which can be a significant limitation of balance map analysis. In this study, it was hypothesized that steady-state walking at various walking speeds would be evaluated as stable for validation of the balance map analysis, and the gait patterns for three types of walking speeds (slow, normal, and fast) were examined. The results showed that the trajectories during the swing phase were within stable regions for all conditions, with a sufficient margin from the forward balance loss region. In addition, the margin from forward balance was reduced with an increase in walking velocity. The decrease in the margin during fast walking resulted from an increase in the forward velocity of the body's center of mass in relation to the velocity of the swing leg. These results suggest that balance map analysis effectively measures walking balance at various speeds.

Identifiers

PMID35369005
PMCPMC8967544
OpenAlexW4221013535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.