Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368971›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2022

Tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis in Scotland: a report on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology standards subgroup.

Owen Cronin, Hannah Preston, Heba Fahmy, Barbara Kuske, Malinder Singh, Naomi Scott, Sean Kerrigan, Lucy Moran, John Harvie, Helen Harris and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances and challenges in management of large vessel vasculitis.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Benchmarking tocilizumab use for giant cell arteritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Owen CroninRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1365-9942
Hannah PrestonRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Heba FahmyRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Barbara KuskeRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Malinder SinghRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Naomi ScottRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Sean KerriganDepartment of Rheumatology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert.
Lucy MoranDepartment of Rheumatology, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK.
John HarvieDepartment of Rheumatology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert.
Helen HarrisRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Barbara HauserRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.
Neil D McKayRheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to describe a modern National Health Service (NHS) Scotland cohort of patients with GCA over 12 months of care to include clinical presentation, practices relating to assessment and treatment, and specifically, the use of tocilizumab. Methods: A multicentre audit of patients newly diagnosed with GCA between November 2019 and October 2021 was established on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology. Clinical data were collected retrospectively by rheumatology teams at participating NHS centres using electronic patient records. An extended cohort of patients from NHS Lothian was examined to investigate outcomes of tocilizumab use for >1 year. Results: Sixty-three patients from three NHS Scotland health boards were included, with analysis of data from 216 clinic episodes. Mean follow-up was 371 days. Mean age was 71 years; 62% were female. The most common presenting features were headache (93.6%), scalp tenderness (82.5%) and ocular symptoms (24%). At baseline, 63% of patients had at least one existing risk factor for adverse outcomes from high-dose CS use, namely hypertension (57.1%), diabetes (24%) and osteoporosis (11%). Thirty per cent of all patients (19 of 63) received tocilizumab, with only 11% (7 of 63) receiving tocilizumab owing to glucocorticoid risk factors at baseline. One-quarter of all patients (16 of 63) experienced relapse of GCA during follow-up, of whom six were subsequently treated with tocilizumab. Conclusion: This multicentre audit demonstrates that despite its availability for patients with risk factors for CS adversity and those who suffer relapse of GCA, tocilizumab is used in less than one-quarter of patients who might benefit. The reasons for this require further exploration.

Indexed as

GCAIL-6temporal arteritisultrasonographyvasculitis

Identifiers

PMID35368971
PMCPMC8969593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.