Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368855›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022

Performance evaluation of various deep learning based models for effective glaucoma evaluation using optical coherence tomography images.

Law Kumar Singh, Pooja, Hitendra Garg, Munish Khanna

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Law Kumar SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sharda University , Greater Noida, India.
PoojaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sharda University , Greater Noida, India.
Hitendra GargDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura, India.
Munish KhannaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Hindustan College of Science and Technology, Mathura, India.
Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science · INGLA University · INSharda University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is the dominant reason for irreversible blindness worldwide, and its best remedy is early and timely detection. Optical coherence tomography has come to be the most commonly used imaging modality in detecting glaucomatous damage in recent years. Deep Learning using Optical Coherence Tomography Modality helps in predicting glaucoma more accurately and less tediously. This experimental study aims to perform glaucoma prediction using eight different ImageNet models from Optical Coherence Tomography of Glaucoma. A thorough investigation is performed to evaluate these models' performances on various efficiency metrics, which will help discover the best performing model. Every net is tested on three different optimizers, namely Adam, Root Mean Squared Propagation, and Stochastic Gradient Descent, to find the best relevant results. An attempt has been made to improvise the performance of models using transfer learning and fine-tuning. The work presented in this study was initially trained and tested on a private database that consists of 4220 images (2110 normal optical coherence tomography and 2110 glaucoma optical coherence tomography). Based on the results, the four best-performing models are shortlisted. Later, these models are tested on the well-recognized standard public Mendeley dataset. Experimental results illustrate that VGG16 using the Root Mean Squared Propagation Optimizer attains auspicious performance with 95.68% accuracy. The proposed work concludes that different ImageNet models are a good alternative as a computer-based automatic glaucoma screening system. This fully automated system has a lot of potential to tell the difference between normal Optical Coherence Tomography and glaucomatous Optical Coherence Tomography automatically. The proposed system helps in efficiently detecting this retinal infection in suspected patients for better diagnosis to avoid vision loss and also decreases senior ophthalmologists' (experts) precious time and involvement.

Indexed as

Convolution neural networkDeep learningEfficient netGlaucomaOptical coherence tomographyVGG16

Identifiers

PMID35368855
PMCPMC8962290
OpenAlexW4220799638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.