ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022
Performance evaluation of various deep learning based models for effective glaucoma evaluation using optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of deep learning models for automatic histopathological grading of meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning-based risk factors for acute-on-chronic liver failure in alcohol-associated liver disease.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- A Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment in Dogs.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning classifiers for predicting treatment-needed retinopathy of prematurity.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the capabilities of vision transformers in sperm morphology analysis: a comparative evaluation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Detection of optic disc in human retinal images utilizing the Bitterling Fish Optimization (BFO) algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novel Approaches for the Early Detection of Glaucoma Using Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A retinal detachment based strabismus detection through FEDCNN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models and Applications for Early Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Clinical Perspectives on the Use of Computer Vision in Glaucoma Screening.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Enhancing foveal avascular zone analysis for Alzheimer's diagnosis with AI segmentation and machine learning using multiple radiomic features.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A new convolutional neural network based on combination of circlets and wavelets for macular OCT classification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Fundus image classification using feature concatenation for early diagnosis of retinal disease.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is the dominant reason for irreversible blindness worldwide, and its best remedy is early and timely detection. Optical coherence tomography has come to be the most commonly used imaging modality in detecting glaucomatous damage in recent years. Deep Learning using Optical Coherence Tomography Modality helps in predicting glaucoma more accurately and less tediously. This experimental study aims to perform glaucoma prediction using eight different ImageNet models from Optical Coherence Tomography of Glaucoma. A thorough investigation is performed to evaluate these models' performances on various efficiency metrics, which will help discover the best performing model. Every net is tested on three different optimizers, namely Adam, Root Mean Squared Propagation, and Stochastic Gradient Descent, to find the best relevant results. An attempt has been made to improvise the performance of models using transfer learning and fine-tuning. The work presented in this study was initially trained and tested on a private database that consists of 4220 images (2110 normal optical coherence tomography and 2110 glaucoma optical coherence tomography). Based on the results, the four best-performing models are shortlisted. Later, these models are tested on the well-recognized standard public Mendeley dataset. Experimental results illustrate that VGG16 using the Root Mean Squared Propagation Optimizer attains auspicious performance with 95.68% accuracy. The proposed work concludes that different ImageNet models are a good alternative as a computer-based automatic glaucoma screening system. This fully automated system has a lot of potential to tell the difference between normal Optical Coherence Tomography and glaucomatous Optical Coherence Tomography automatically. The proposed system helps in efficiently detecting this retinal infection in suspected patients for better diagnosis to avoid vision loss and also decreases senior ophthalmologists' (experts) precious time and involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.