ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and
Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The TOXIN knowledge graph: supporting animal-free risk assessment of cosmetics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- TOXTRUST: a tool leveraging the Dempster-Shafer Theory for robust integration of NAM results in decision-making considering uncertainty.NAM journal · 2025Article
- Bridging science and curriculum: preparing future leaders in computational toxicology.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Review
- Editorial: Model organisms in predictive toxicology 2023.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- A problem formulation framework for the application of in silico toxicology methods in chemical risk assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
- Drug review process advancement and required manufacturer and contract research oraganization responses.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2024Review
- Developing a pragmatic consensus procedure supporting the ICH S1B(R1) weight of evidence carcinogenicity assessment.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Article
- Principles and Procedures for Assessment of Acute Toxicity IncorporatingComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integratesComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the reliability and relevance of a toxicological assessment is important for gauging the overall confidence and communicating the degree of uncertainty related to it. The process involved in assessing reliability and relevance is well defined for experimental data. Similar criteria need to be established for
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.