Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368750›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Effects and Safety of the Tripterygium Glycoside Adjuvant Methotrexate Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qi Geng, Bin Liu, Yanfang Ma, Huizhen Li, Nannan Shi, Guilin Ouyang, Zhixing Nie, Jianfeng Yi, Yaolong Chen, Yanping Wang and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Efficacy and safety ofPharmaceutical biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qi GengInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Bin LiuInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Yanfang MaEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Huizhen LiInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Nannan ShiInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Guilin OuyangShanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integreted Tranditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai 200050, China.
Zhixing NieShanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integreted Tranditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai 200050, China.
Jianfeng YiChemical and Biological Engineering, Yichun University, Yichun 336000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-5871
Yaolong ChenEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9841-5233
Yanping WangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-7746
Cheng LuInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6474-9198
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNLanzhou University · CNShanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine · CNJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy and clinical safety of different courses and doses of tripterygium glycoside (TG) adjuvant methotrexate (MTX) therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TG adjuvant MTX therapy in patients with RA were retrieved from SinoMed, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to September 30, 2021. The effects and clinical safety evaluations were conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 9 RCTs and 892 patients with RA were included in this study. In the meta-analysis, a total of 463 and 429 patients were enrolled into the TG adjuvant MTX therapy group and MTX monotherapy group, respectively. In comparison with MTX monotherapy, the results of the analyzed effects showed that the TG adjuvant MTX therapy can achieve 20%, 50%, and 70% improvements in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Conclusions: TG adjuvant MTX therapy is more effective than MTX monotherapy and is a safe strategy for RA treatment in doses of 30 or 60 mg/day over a treatment course of six months. However, high-quality multicenter RCT studies with large sample sizes are still needed to confirm the effects and clinical safety of different courses and doses of TG adjuvant MTX therapy.

Identifiers

PMID35368750
PMCPMC8970871
OpenAlexW4220960807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.