Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368648›Full record

ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2022

Inequitable Access to Transplants: Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity.

Rebecca L Thom, Anne Dalle-Ave, Eline M Bunnik, Tanja Krones, Kristof Van Assche, Alex Ruck Keene, Antonia J Cronin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcome of Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Literature Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systems Connected to Inequities in Access to Kidney Transplantation and the Value of Intersectionality.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca L ThomKings College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne Dalle-AveEthics Unit, Institute of Humanities in Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, London, United Kingdom.
Eline M BunnikDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tanja KronesDepartment of Clinical Ethics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kristof Van AsscheUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alex Ruck Keene39 Essex Chambers, London, United Kingdom.
Antonia J CroninGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203376/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequitable access to deceased donor organs for transplantation has received considerable scrutiny in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests patients with impaired decision-making capacity (IDC) face inequitable access to transplantation. The "Ethical and Legal Issues" working group of the European Society of Transplantation undertook an expert consensus process. Literature relating to transplantation in patients with IDC was examined and collated to investigate whether IDC is associated with inferior transplant outcomes and the legitimacy of this healthcare inequality was examined. Even though the available evidence of inferior transplant outcomes in these patients is limited, the working group concluded that access to transplantation in patients with IDC may be inequitable. Consequently, we argue that IDC should not in and of itself be considered as a barrier to either registration on the transplant waiting list or allocation of an organ. Strategies for non-discrimination should focus on ensuring eligibility is based upon sound evidence and outcomes without reference to non-medical criteria. Recommendations to support policy makers and healthcare providers to reduce unintended inequity and inadvertent discrimination are set out. We call upon transplant centres and national bodies to include data on decision-making capacity in routine reporting schedules in order to improve the evidence base upon which organ policy decisions are made going forward.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultHumanscapacityequitable accessethicslaw and policytransplantation

Identifiers

PMID35368648
PMCPMC8971203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.