Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368546›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

A differential equation, deduced from a DNA-type genetic algorithm with the lagging-strand-biased mutagenesis.

Ichiro Fujihara, Mitsuru Furusawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichiro FujiharaCollege of General Education, Osaka Sangyo University, Daito-shi, Osaka 574-8530, Japan.
Mitsuru FurusawaChitose Laboratory Corp., Biotechnology Research Center, 2-13-3 Nogawa-honcho, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-0041, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence indicated that the significant fidelity difference existed between the leading and lagging-strand. Using a 2-D DNA-type genetic algorithm (GA), we have shown that the lagging-stand-biased mutagenesis (disparity mutagenesis) has a significant advantage in the promotion of evolution, compared with the traditional parity mutagenesis model. Our aim of the present study was to deduce a differential equation which well reflected the result of simulations. The analytical solution of the differential equation obtained was in good agreement with the results of the simulation experiment. Comparing the results of the disparity mutagenesis with those of the parity one, the characteristics of the disparity mutagenesis were discussed in terms of relative mutation rates between the lagging and leading strands. Conditions of the extinction of a species were also discussed.

Indexed as

2D DNA-type GADifferential equationDisparity mutagenesisEvolutionGenetic algorithm

Identifiers

PMID35368546
PMCPMC8965971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.