ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2022
Rationale and design of the PROspective ATHletic Heart (Pro@Heart) study: long-term assessment of the determinants of cardiac remodelling and its clinical consequences in endurance athletes.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05164328 (Prospective Athlete's Heart Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Athlete's Heart Study: Long-term Assessment of the Determinants of Cardiac Remodelling and Its Clinical Consequences in Endurance Athletes
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relating QRS voltages to left ventricular mass and body composition in elite endurance athletes.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Trial
- Bradycardia in Athletes: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Risks.Circulation · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of different exercise blood pressure metrics in identifying hypertension on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in athletes.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- China Elite Athletes Cardiovascular hEath (China-ACE) Study: A Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Cohort.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Balancing Exercise Benefits Against Heartbeat Consumption in Elite Cyclists.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Lifelong physiology of a former marathon world-record holder: the pros and cons of extreme cardiac remodeling.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024Article
- Racial and Gender Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Atrial Fibrillation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Reduced Ejection Fraction in Elite Endurance Athletes: Clinical and Genetic Overlap With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Circulation · 2024Article
- No adverse association between exercise exposure and diffuse myocardial fibrosis in male endurance athletes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exercise-induced myocardial T1 increase and right ventricular dysfunction in recreational cyclists: a CMR study.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
- The Prevalence of Cardiovascular Diseases in Paralympic Athletes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exercise-induced cardiac remodelling (EICR) results from the structural, functional and electrical adaptations to exercise. Despite similar sports participation, EICR varies and some athletes develop phenotypic features that overlap with cardiomyopathies. Training load and genotype may explain some of the variation; however, exercise 'dose' has lacked rigorous quantification. Few have investigated the association between EICR and genotype. Objectives: (1) To identify the impact of training load and genotype on the variance of EICR in elite endurance athletes and (2) determine how EICR and its determinants are associated with physical performance, health benefits and cardiac pathology. Methods: The Pro@Heart study is a multicentre prospective cohort trial. Three hundred elite endurance athletes aged 14-23 years will have comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping using echocardiography, cardiac MRI, 12-lead ECG, exercise-ECG and 24-hour-Holter monitoring. Genotype will be determined using a custom cardiomyopathy gene panel and high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Follow-up will include online tracking of training load. Cardiac phenotyping will be repeated at 2, 5, 10 and 20 years. Results: The primary endpoint of the Pro@Heart study is the association of EICR with both training load and genotype. The latter will include rare variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes and polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular traits. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, physical performance and health benefits and their association with training load and genotype. Conclusion: The Pro@Heart study is the first long-term cohort study to assess the impact of training load and genotype on EICR. Trial registration number: NCT05164328; ACTRN12618000716268.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.