Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368447›Full record

ArticleSimplifying medical ultrasound : second international workshop, ASMUS 2021 : held in conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France, September 27, 2021 : proceedings. ASMUS (Workshop) (2nd : 2021 : Online)2021

Towards Scale and Position Invariant Task Classification using Normalised Visual Scanpaths in Clinical Fetal Ultrasound.

Clare Teng, Harshita Sharma, Lior Drukker, Aris T Papageorghiou, J Alison Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Simplifying medical ultrasound : second international workshop, ASMUS 2021 : held in conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France, September 27, 2021 : proceedings. ASMUS (Workshop) (2nd : 2021 : Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Skill, or Style? Classification of Fetal Sonography Eye-Tracking Data.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023
    Article
  4. Multimodal-GuideNet: Gaze-Probe Bidirectional Guidance in Obstetric Ultrasound Scanning.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clare TengInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Harshita SharmaInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lior DrukkerNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aris T PapageorghiouNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Alison NobleInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 694581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method for classifying tasks in fetal ultrasound scans using the eye-tracking data of sonographers. The visual attention of a sonographer captured by eye-tracking data over time is defined by a scanpath. In routine fetal ultrasound, the captured standard imaging planes are visually inconsistent due to fetal position, movements, and sonographer scanning experience. To address this challenge, we propose a scale and position invariant task classification method using normalised visual scanpaths. We describe a normalisation method that uses bounding boxes to provide the gaze with a reference to the position and scale of the imaging plane and use the normalised scanpath sequences to train machine learning models for discriminating between ultrasound tasks. We compare the proposed method to existing work considering raw eyetracking data. The best performing model achieves the F1-score of 84% and outperforms existing models.

Indexed as

Eye-trackingfetal ultrasoundtime-series classificationvisual scanpath

Identifiers

PMID35368447
PMCPMC7612565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.