Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368391›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2022

The effect of laparoscopy on intracranial pressure as measured by optic nerve sheath diameter: A review.

Kevin G Mitchell, Ryan B Appleby, Melissa D Sinclair, Ameet Singh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin G MitchellDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Ryan B ApplebyDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Melissa D SinclairDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Ameet SinghDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has many benefits over open surgery including lower complication rates, and shorter duration and lower cost of hospitalization. However, recent human literature suggests laparoscopy and carbon dioxide insufflation can result in intracranial hypertension. Invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure is not routinely performed in veterinary medicine, and ultrasonographic evaluation of the optic nerve sheath has been employed as an indirect measure of intracranial pressure in many species. The optic nerve sheath is continuous with the meninges of the brain and becomes distended with intracranial hypertension. Optic nerve sheath diameter is a reliable and consistent measure of intracranial pressure and has been utilized in humans to evaluate patients for intracranial hypertension secondary to laparoscopy and capnoperitoneum. No thorough evaluation of the effects of laparoscopy on intracranial pressure has been performed in dogs. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the optic nerve sheath is a safe, non-invasive, and inexpensive procedure that may allow for the evaluation of intracranial pressure without the need for invasive monitoring systems. As laparoscopic procedures are performed increasingly often, this review aims to inform the reader on the effects of capnoperitoneum and to facilitate appropriate patient selection, anesthetic considerations, and surgical planning.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesIntracranial HypertensionLaparoscopyAnimalsDogsHumansIntracranial PressureOptic NerveUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35368391
PMCPMC8922386
OpenAlexW4226117612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.