Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368340›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

NanoForms: an integrated server for processing, analysis and assembly of raw sequencing data of microbial genomes, from Oxford Nanopore technology.

Anna Czmil, Michal Wronski, Sylwester Czmil, Marta Sochacka-Pietal, Michal Cmil, Jan Gawor, Tomasz Wołkowicz, Dariusz Plewczynski, Dominik Strzalka, Michal Pietal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diosgenin producingComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Genome-Guided Identification of Surfactin-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Whole Genome Sequencing: Applications in Clinical Bacteriology.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Genomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Mining the nanotube-formingComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna Czmil *Department of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Michal Wronski *Department of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Sylwester CzmilDepartment of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Marta Sochacka-PietalDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Michal CmilDepartment of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Jan GaworDNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Masovian, Poland.
Tomasz WołkowiczDepartment of Bacteriology and Biocontamination Control, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Masovian, Poland.
Dariusz PlewczynskiLaboratory of Functional and Structural Genomics, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Masovian, Poland.
Dominik StrzalkaDepartment of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.
Michal PietalDepartment of Complex Systems, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Subcarpathian, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques dominate today's landscape of genetics and genomics research. Though Illumina still dominates worldwide sequencing, Oxford Nanopore is one of the leading technologies currently being used by biologists, medics and geneticists across various applications. Oxford Nanopore is automated and relatively simple for conducting experiments, but generates gigabytes of raw data, to be processed by often ambiguous set of alternative bioinformatics command-line tools, and genomics frameworks which require a knowledge of bioinformatics to run. Results: We established an inter-collegiate collaboration across experimentalists and bioinformaticians in order to provide a novel bioinformatics tool, free for academics. This tool allows people without extensive bioinformatics knowledge to simply process their raw genome sequencing data. Currently, due to ICT resources' maintenance reasons, our server is only capable of handling small genomes (up to 15 Mb). In this paper, we introduce our tool, NanoForms: an intuitive and integrated web server for the processing and analysis of raw prokaryotic genome data, coming from Oxford Nanopore. NanoForms is freely available for academics at the following locations: http://nanoforms.tech (webserver) and https://github.com/czmilanna/nanoforms (GitHub source repository).

Indexed as

NanoporesComputersGenome, MicrobialGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNABioinformaticsDNA assemblyDNA sequencingGenomicsMicrobial genomesNGSOxford NanoporeWebserver

Identifiers

PMID35368340
PMCPMC8973472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.