Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368331›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Responsiveness of domesticated goats towards various stressors following long-term cognitive test exposure.

Katrina Rosenberger, Michael Simmler, Jan Langbein, Christian Nawroth, Nina Keil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrina RosenbergerGraduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael SimmlerDigital Production, Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
Jan LangbeinInstitute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1170-5431
Christian NawrothInstitute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-4057
Nina KeilCentre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-7682
Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEAgroscope · CHFederal Food Safety and Veterinary Office · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4-5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation

Indexed as

GoatsVisual PerceptionAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansNeuropsychological TestsReversal LearningAnimal cognitionAnimal handlingHabituationSelection for productivityStress

Identifiers

PMID35368331
PMCPMC8973470
OpenAlexW4220683250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.