Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368273›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Automated Skull Stripping in Mouse Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Using 3D U-Net.

Guohui Ruan, Jiaming Liu, Ziqi An, Kaiibin Wu, Chuanjun Tong, Qiang Liu, Ping Liang, Zhifeng Liang, Wufan Chen, Xinyuan Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain-Wide Spatiotemporally Distinct Traveling Waves Drive Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Mice.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guohui RuanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaming LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziqi AnSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kaiibin WuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanjun TongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ping LiangXGY Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China.
Zhifeng LiangKey Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Sciences and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Wufan ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyuan ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanqiu FengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skull stripping is an initial and critical step in the pipeline of mouse fMRI analysis. Manual labeling of the brain usually suffers from intra- and inter-rater variability and is highly time-consuming. Hence, an automatic and efficient skull-stripping method is in high demand for mouse fMRI studies. In this study, we investigated a 3D U-Net based method for automatic brain extraction in mouse fMRI studies. Two U-Net models were separately trained on T2-weighted anatomical images and T2*-weighted functional images. The trained models were tested on both interior and exterior datasets. The 3D U-Net models yielded a higher accuracy in brain extraction from both T2-weighted images (Dice > 0.984, Jaccard index > 0.968 and Hausdorff distance < 7.7) and T2*-weighted images (Dice > 0.964, Jaccard index > 0.931 and Hausdorff distance < 3.3), compared with the two widely used mouse skull-stripping methods (RATS and SHERM). The resting-state fMRI results using automatic segmentation with the 3D U-Net models are highly consistent with those obtained by manual segmentation for both the seed-based and group independent component analysis. These results demonstrate that the 3D U-Net based method can replace manual brain extraction in mouse fMRI analysis.

Indexed as

3D U-Netdeep learningfMRImouseskull stripping

Identifiers

PMID35368273
PMCPMC8965644
OpenAlexW4221098367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.