Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368218›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

The Association Between Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pathological Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer Patients After Resection: Prognostic Significance of Microscopic Venous Invasion.

Hidemasa Kubo, Katsuhisa Ohgi, Teiichi Sugiura, Ryo Ashida, Mihoko Yamada, Shimpei Otsuka, Kentaro Yamazaki, Akiko Todaka, Keiko Sasaki, Katsuhiko Uesaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hidemasa KuboDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsuhisa OhgiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan. ka.ogi@scchr.jp.
Teiichi SugiuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ryo AshidaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mihoko YamadaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shimpei OtsukaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kentaro YamazakiDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Akiko TodakaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keiko SasakiDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsuhiko UesakaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on pathological outcomes, including microscopic venous invasion (MVI), remains unclear in pancreatic cancer.

methodsA total of 456 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer between July 2012 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with NAT (n = 120, 26%) and those without NAT (n = 336, 74%). Clinicopathological factors, survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were analyzed.

resultsRegarding pathological findings, the proportion of MVI was significantly lower in patients with NAT than in those without NAT (43% vs 62%, P = 0.001). The 5-year survival rate in patients with NAT was significantly better than that in those without NAT (54% vs 45%, P = 0.030). A multivariate analysis showed that MVI was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio 2.86, P = 0.003) in patients who underwent NAT. MVI was an independent risk factor for liver recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, P = 0.016) and multiple-site recurrence (OR 1.92, P = 0.027) according to a multivariate analysis. The OS in patients with liver recurrence was significantly worse than that in patients with other recurrence patterns (vs lymph node, P = 0.047; vs local, P < 0.001; vs lung, P < 0.001). The absence of NAT was a significant risk factor for MVI (OR 1.93, P = 0.007).

conclusionMVI was a crucial prognostic factor associated with liver and multiple-site recurrence in pancreatic cancer patients with NAT. MVI may be reduced by NAT, which may contribute to the improvement of survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPancreatectomyPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35368218
OpenAlexW4225669922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.