Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368084›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2022

Individualized Prediction of Drug Response and Rational Combination Therapy in NSCLC Using Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Studies of Acute Phosphoproteomic Changes.

Elizabeth A Coker, Adam Stewart, Bugra Ozer, Anna Minchom, Lisa Pickard, Ruth Ruddle, Suzanne Carreira, Sanjay Popat, Mary O'Brien, Florence Raynaud and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth A Coker *Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4934-8887
Adam Stewart *Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Bugra Ozer *Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-4162
Anna Minchom *Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9339-7101
Lisa Pickard *Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth RuddleDivision of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0025-8872
Suzanne CarreiraDivision of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5077-5379
Sanjay PopatDivision of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-4963
Mary O'BrienThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-8957
Florence RaynaudDivision of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Johann de BonoDivision of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-595X
Bissan Al-Lazikani *Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3367-2519
Udai BanerjiDivision of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-3123
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22897Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesize that the study of acute protein perturbation in signal transduction by targeted anticancer drugs can predict drug sensitivity of these agents used as single agents and rational combination therapy. We assayed dynamic changes in 52 phosphoproteins caused by an acute exposure (1 hour) to clinically relevant concentrations of seven targeted anticancer drugs in 35 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and 16 samples of NSCLC cells isolated from pleural effusions. We studied drug sensitivities across 35 cell lines and synergy of combinations of all drugs in six cell lines (252 combinations). We developed orthogonal machine-learning approaches to predict drug response and rational combination therapy. Our methods predicted the most and least sensitive quartiles of drug sensitivity with an AUC of 0.79 and 0.78, respectively, whereas predictions based on mutations in three genes commonly known to predict response to the drug studied, for example, EGFR, PIK3CA, and KRAS, did not predict sensitivity (AUC of 0.5 across all quartiles). The machine-learning predictions of combinations that were compared with experimentally generated data showed a bias to the highest quartile of Bliss synergy scores (P = 0.0243). We confirmed feasibility of running such assays on 16 patient samples of freshly isolated NSCLC cells from pleural effusions. We have provided proof of concept for novel methods of using acute ex vivo exposure of cancer cells to targeted anticancer drugs to predict response as single agents or combinations. These approaches could complement current approaches using gene mutations/amplifications/rearrangements as biomarkers and demonstrate the utility of proteomics data to inform treatment selection in the clinic.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPleural EffusionArtificial IntelligenceHumansMutationAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35368084
PMCPMC9381105
OpenAlexW4225531330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.