Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35368044›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2022

MRI radiomics independent of clinical baseline characteristics and neoadjuvant treatment modalities predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

Maxiaowei Song, Shuai Li, Hongzhi Wang, Ke Hu, Fengwei Wang, Huajing Teng, Zhi Wang, Jin Liu, Angela Y Jia, Yong Cai and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostic Value of Plasma Long Non-coding SLC26A4 Antisense RNA 1 Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maxiaowei Song *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Shuai Li *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Hongzhi Wang *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ke HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fengwei WangDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China.
Huajing TengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3618
Zhi WangBlot Info & Tech (Beijing) Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jin LiuBlot Info & Tech (Beijing) Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.
Angela Y JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yong CaiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yongheng LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Xianggao ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianhao GengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yangzi ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
XiangBo WanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical Engineering, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-6188
Weihu WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China. wangweihu88@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-398X
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJohns Hopkins University · USSun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyse the performance of multicentre pre-treatment MRI-based radiomics (MBR) signatures combined with clinical baseline characteristics and neoadjuvant treatment modalities to predict complete response to neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

methodsBaseline MRI and clinical characteristics with neoadjuvant treatment modalities at four centres were collected. Decision tree, support vector machine and five-fold cross-validation were applied for two non-imaging and three radiomics-based models' development and validation.

resultsWe finally included 674 patients. Pre-treatment CEA, T stage, and histologic grade were selected to generate two non-imaging models: C model (clinical baseline characteristics alone) and CT model (clinical baseline characteristics combining neoadjuvant treatment modalities). The prediction performance of both non-imaging models were poor. The MBR signatures comprising 30 selected radiomics features, the MBR signatures combining clinical baseline characteristics (CMBR), and the CMBR incorporating neoadjuvant treatment modalities (CTMBR) all showed good discrimination with mean AUCs of 0.7835, 0.7871 and 0.7916 in validation sets, respectively. The three radiomics-based models had insignificant discrimination in performance.

conclusionsThe performance of the radiomics-based models were superior to the non-imaging models. MBR signatures seemed to reflect LARC's true nature more accurately than clinical parameters and helped identify patients who can undergo organ preservation strategies.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectumRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35368044
PMCPMC9296479
OpenAlexW4224274396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.