ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2022
Advancements in neonatology through quality improvement.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A FAR-Out approach for evaluating the impact of clinical practice changes on severe intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology for reproductive healthcare: a comprehensive review.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- A comprehensive benchmark of very preterm and extremely preterm infant care in Shenzhen: insights from the triple aim framework.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Newborn screening for primary congenital hypothyroidism: past, present and future.European thyroid journal · 2025Review
- A Survey on the Organization and Operation of Level II/III Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Greece: A Comparison Between 2004 and 2022.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Breast Milk Stem Cells in the Treatment of Neonatal Diseases.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Mortality of very low birth weight infants by neonatal intensive care unit workload and regional group status.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024Article
- The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Nanotechnologies in Obstetrics and Cancer during Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past 3 decades, quality improvement methodology has often been employed in medicine to improve patient outcomes. Neonatal medicine has seen an increase in publications using improvement science to ensure the application of potentially better practices to decrease complications and increase survival without major disability. This article reviews quality improvement studies that have impacted neonatal mortality and morbidity, as well as specific disease processes including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity. Using improvement science, studies have substantially reduced neonatal mortality and the major complications of preterm birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35368024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.