An Investigation on the Consciousness of Patients and Pharmacists Regarding Inhaler Education.

Takeo Nakajima, Tatsuya Nagano, Daisuke Hojo, Yoshihiro Nishimura

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takeo NakajimaNakajima Medical Clinic, Kobe, Japan.

Tatsuya NaganoDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Daisuke HojoI&H Co., Ltd., Ashiya, Japan.

Yoshihiro NishimuraDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have focused on the awareness of inhaler education in patients and pharmacists who have crucial roles in inhaler education. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in awareness of inhaler education between patients and pharmacists. We conducted questionnaire-based surveys involving 270 patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 139 pharmacists of 13 pharmacies belonging to the same chain dispensing pharmacy in Hyogo prefecture of Japan in July 2011. We obtained valid responses from 230 patients (85.2%) and 139 pharmacists (100%). Although 75% of pharmacists provided inhaler education about the importance of continuation, only 16% of patients felt that they had learned the importance of continuation. Similarly, 95% of pharmacists provided inhaler education about the importance of gargling, however, only 57% of patients felt that they had learned the importance of gargling. This survey clarified the difference in awareness between pharmacists and patients on inhaler education. It proved to be difficult to educate patients on the importance of compliance and gargling.

Indexed as

AsthmaPharmaciesConsciousnessHumansNebulizers and VaporizersPharmacistsInhaler educationPatientPharmacistQuestionnaire Survey

Identifiers

PMID35367998

PMCPMC9677580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.