ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2021
Hydration Status of Junior Tennis Players and the Difference after a Lecture on Its Practice.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dehydration reduces exercise performance and causes heat-related illness. However, the fact that dehydration is a serious sports injury is often forgotten, especially among junior tennis players, who engage in tennis matches alone without receiving advice from others. Our objective was to investigate the hydration status of junior tennis players and the difference after attending a lecture on the importance of hydration. In total, 157 junior tennis players attending a training camp participated in this study. The duration of the camp was two days, and a lecture was organized on the first night to educate the players about hydration using a body mass scale. Body mass (BM) was measured immediately before and after practice on the first and second day. The water loss rate (WLR) was calculated by dividing the loss in BM during practice by the BM before practice. In total, 34.4% of players had attended a lecture on hydration in the past. These players had a lower WLR than those who had not, but the difference was not significant. The WLR was significantly lower after attending our lecture than that before. This study suggests that a lecture on hydration could immediately improve the hydration status of the junior tennis players; however, this effect may not be lasting. They may need help from their coaches and parents to implement what they have learned in lecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35367993PMC9673881W4226201050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.