Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35367528›Full record

Trial reportRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2022

Low-dose Radiation Therapy in the Management of COVID-19 Pneumonia (LOWRAD-Cov19). Final results of a prospective phase I-II trial.

Noelia Sanmamed, Pino Alcantara, Sara Gómez, Ana Bustos, Elena Cerezo, Miren Gaztañaga, Anxela Doval, Juan Corona, Gabriel Rodriguez, Noemi Cabello and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. In Reply to Li et al.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023
    Article
  7. In Regard to Kolahdouzan et al.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noelia SanmamedRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Investigation Institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: noelia.sanmamed@salud.madrid.org.
Pino AlcantaraInvestigation Institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Radiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine. Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
Sara GómezRadiology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ana BustosRadiology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Elena CerezoRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Miren GaztañagaRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Investigation Institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Anxela DovalRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Juan CoronaRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine. Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
Gabriel RodriguezMedical Physics Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Noemi CabelloInternal Medicine Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes DuffortInternal Medicine Department, Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco OrtuñoIntensive Care Unit, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Javier de CastroIntensive Care Unit, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Amanda LópezInvestigation Institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel FuentesPreventive Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Alvaro SanzMedical Oncology Department, Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Manuel VazquezRadiation Oncology Department, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Investigation Institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine. Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESHospital Universitario Río Hortega · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo evaluate the results of low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) to lungs in the management of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective phase I-II trial enrolling COVID-19 patients ≥50 years-old, with bilateral lung involvement at imaging study and oxygen requirement (oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air). Patients received 1 Gy to whole lungs in a single fraction. Primary outcome was a radiological response assessed as severity and extension scores at days +3 and +7. Secondary outcomes were toxicity (CTCAE v5.0), days of hospitalization, changes in inflammatory blood parameters (ferritin, lymphocytes, C-reactive protein, d-dimer and LDH) and SatO

resultsForty-one patients were included. Median age was 71 (IQR 60-84). Eighteen patients (44%) previously received an anti-COVID treatment (tocilizumab, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir) and thirty-two patients (84%) received steroids during LD-RT. The extension score improved significantly (p = 0.02) on day +7. Mean baseline extension score was 13.7 (SD ± 4.9) with a score of 12.2 (±5.2) at day 3, and 12.4 ± 4.7 at day 7. No differences were found in the severity score. SAFI improved significantly on day +3 and +7 (p < 0.01). Median SAFI on day 0 was 147 (IQR 118-264), 230 (IQR 120-343) on day +3 and 293 (IQR 121-353) on day +7. Significant decrease was found in C-reactive protein on day +7 (p = 0.02) and in lymphocytes counts on day +3 and +7 (p = 0.02). The median number of days in hospital after RT was 11 (range 4-78). With a median follow-up of 60 days after LD-RT, 26 (63%) patients were discharged, 11 (27%) died because of COVID respiratory failure and 4 (10%) died of other causes.

conclusionsLD-RT is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment that could lead to rapid clinical improvement. Large randomized trials would be required to establish the efficacy of LD-RT to treat COVID-19 pneumonia.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedC-Reactive ProteinHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeC-Reactive ProteinBenign diseaseCOVID-19LD-RTPneumoniaRadiation

Identifiers

PMID35367528
PMCPMC8968128
OpenAlexW4220812614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.