Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35367003›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2022

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the DNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ZyCoV-D): the interim efficacy results of a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in India.

Akash Khobragade, Suresh Bhate, Vijendra Ramaiah, Shrikant Deshpande, Krishna Giri, Himanshu Phophle, Pravin Supe, Inderjeet Godara, Ramesh Revanna, Rajnish Nagarkar and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Akash KhobragadeGrant Government Medical College and Sir J J Group of Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: akash.khobragade@gmail.com.
Suresh BhateJeevan Rekha Hospital, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Vijendra RamaiahKempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Center, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shrikant DeshpandeAshirwad Hospital, Ulhasnagar, Maharashtra, India.
Krishna GiriDhadiwal Hospital Research Department, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Himanshu PhophleAce Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Pravin SupeSupe Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Inderjeet GodaraMarudhar Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Ramesh RevannaN R R Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rajnish NagarkarHCG Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Jayesh SanmukhaniZydus Corporate Park, Cadila Healthcare, Ahmedabad, India.
Ayan DeyVaccine Technology Centre, Cadila Healthcare, Ahmedabad, India.
T M Chozhavel RajanathanVaccine Technology Centre, Cadila Healthcare, Ahmedabad, India.
Kevinkumar KansagraZydus Research Center, Cadila Healthcare, Ahmedabad, India.
Parshottam KoradiaBAPS Pramukh Swami Hospital, Adajan, Surat, India.
ZyCoV-D phase 3 Study Investigator Group
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INACE Hospital · INAshwini Hospital · INDr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital · INGovernment Medical College · INHCG Cancer Centre · INKempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences · INNRR Hospital · INPramukhswami Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZyCoV-D, a DNA-based vaccine, showed promising safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1/2 trial. We now report the interim efficacy results of phase 3 clinical trial with ZyCoV-D vaccine in India.

methodsWe conducted an interim analysis of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial at 49 centres in India. Healthy participants aged at least 12 years were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ZyCov-D vaccine (Cadila Healthcare; 2 mg per dose) or placebo. An interactive web response system was used for randomisation (blocks of four) of participants as well as to enrol those aged 60 years and older with or without comorbid conditions, and those aged 12-17 years. It was also used to identify 600 participants for immunogenicity (blocks of six). Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. Three doses of vaccine or placebo were administered intradermally via a needle-free injection system 28 days apart. The primary outcome was the number of participants with first occurrence of symptomatic RT-PCR-positive COVID-19 28 days after the third dose, until the targeted number of cases (interim analysis n=79, full analysis n=158) have been achieved. The analysis was done in the per-protocol population, which consisted of all participants with negative baseline SARS-CoV-2 status who received three doses of vaccine or placebo. Assessment of safety and tolerability was based on the safety population, which consisted of all enrolled participants who were known to have received at least one dose of study vaccine or placebo. This trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry India, CTRI/2021/01/030416, and is ongoing.

findingsBetween Jan 16, and June 23, 2021 (data cutoff), 33 194 individuals were screened, of whom 5241 did not meet screening criteria and 27 703 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ZyCoV-D (n=13 851) or placebo (n=13 852). Per-protocol, 81 cases were eligible and included in efficacy analysis (20 of 12 350 in the ZyCoV-D group and 61 of 12 320 in placebo group). The ZyCoV-D vaccine efficacy was found to be 66·6% (95% CI 47·6-80·7). The occurrence of solicited adverse events was similar between the treatment groups (623 [4·49%] in the ZyCoV-D group vs 620 [4·47%] in the placebo group). There were two deaths (one in each group) reported at the data cutoff, neither of which was considered related to the study treatments.

interpretationIn this interim analysis, ZyCoV-D vaccine was found to be efficacious, safe, and immunogenic in a phase 3 trial.

fundingNational Biopharma Mission, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and Cadila Healthcare, Ahmedabad, Gujarat India.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAgedChildDNADouble-Blind MethodHumansIndiaMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesDNA

Identifiers

PMID35367003
PMCPMC8970574
OpenAlexW4220680697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.