Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366923›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2022

Tree diet: reducing the treewidth to unlock FPT algorithms in RNA bioinformatics.

Bertrand Marchand, Yann Ponty, Laurent Bulteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Finding maximum common contractions between phylogenetic networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  2. Median and small parsimony problems on RNA trees.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bertrand MarchandLIX CNRS UMR 7161, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France.
Yann PontyLIX CNRS UMR 7161, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France. yann.ponty@lix.polytechnique.fr.
Laurent BulteauLIGM, CNRS, Univ Gustave Eiffel, 77454, Marne-la-Vallée, France. laurent.bulteau@u-pem.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hard graph problems are ubiquitous in Bioinformatics, inspiring the design of specialized Fixed-Parameter Tractable algorithms, many of which rely on a combination of tree-decomposition and dynamic programming. The time/space complexities of such approaches hinge critically on low values for the treewidth tw of the input graph. In order to extend their scope of applicability, we introduce the TREE-DIET problem, i.e. the removal of a minimal set of edges such that a given tree-decomposition can be slimmed down to a prescribed treewidth [Formula: see text]. Our rationale is that the time gained thanks to a smaller treewidth in a parameterized algorithm compensates the extra post-processing needed to take deleted edges into account. Our core result is an FPT dynamic programming algorithm for TREE-DIET, using [Formula: see text] time and space. We complement this result with parameterized complexity lower-bounds for stronger variants (e.g., NP-hardness when [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] is constant). We propose a prototype implementation for our approach which we apply on difficult instances of selected RNA-based problems: RNA design, sequence-structure alignment, and search of pseudoknotted RNAs in genomes, revealing very encouraging results. This work paves the way for a wider adoption of tree-decomposition-based algorithms in Bioinformatics.

Indexed as

FPT algorithmsRNARNA designstructure sequence alignmenttreewidth

Identifiers

PMID35366923
PMCPMC8976393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.