Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366910›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Socio-economic correlates of quality of life in single and married urban individuals: a Polish case study.

Daniel Puciato, Michał Rozpara, Marek Bugdol, Barbara Mróz-Gorgoń

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel PuciatoFaculty of Finance and Management, WSB University in Wrocław, ul. Fabryczna 29-31, 53-609, Wrocław, Poland. daniel.puciato@wsb.wroclaw.pl.
Michał RozparaInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, ul. Mikołowska 72A, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Marek BugdolFaculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, ul. prof. St. Łojasiewicza 4, 30-348, Kraków, Poland.
Barbara Mróz-GorgońFaculty of Business and Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, ul. Komandorska 118-120, 53-345, Wrocław, Poland.
Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach · PLJagiellonian University · PLWroclaw University of Economics and Business · PLWSB Merito University in Wroclaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of key current social trends is the increasing number of single people. It has multiple implications as single individuals often live and behave differently than those living in relationships. Marital status and socioeconomic status may also be significant quality of life factors for single persons. The aim of this study is to identify relationships between quality of life and selected indicators of socioeconomic status in single and married respondents from the Wrocław metropolitan area in Poland.

methods4460 respondents took part in the study (1828 single, 2632 married). The study was cross-sectional based on a diagnostic survey. Data was gathered on respondents' sex, age, education, marital status, occupational status and financial situation as well as their quality of life and perceived health condition. Frequencies (f) and relative frequencies (rf) of categories of dependent and independent variables were determined. The chi-squared test (χ

resultsA stochastic dependence (p ≤ .05) between marital status and perceived health condition and quality of life in the social domain was found among the respondents. Male sex, higher education, being an entrepreneur, college student or white-collar worker, and good financial status were associated with the highest assessments of quality of life and perceived health condition. The directions of quality of life modifications determined by socioeconomic status were similar in single and married urban respondents; however, the strength of these modifications was greater in the latter.

conclusionsIt is recommended to target respondents with public health programs aimed at lifestyle improvement, tailored to the needs of single and married individuals. Public policies directed at improving education and material situation of respondents are also worth considering, as they may be essential for modeling their quality of life. In addition, research on quality of life should be continued, which is particularly relevant in a pandemic situation.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSocial ClassCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePolandSurveys and QuestionnairesMarital statusQuality of lifeSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID35366910
PMCPMC8977027
OpenAlexW4225254869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.