Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366871›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Complementary and alternative medicine modalities used to treat adverse effects of anti-cancer treatment among children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dana C Mora, Grete Overvåg, Miek C Jong, Agnete E Kristoffersen, Debbie C Stavleu, Jianping Liu, Trine Stub

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardiovascular Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dana C MoraDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. dana.c.mora@uit.no.
Grete OvervågScience and Health Library, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019, Tromsø, Norway.
Miek C JongDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Agnete E KristoffersenDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Debbie C StavleuPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jianping LiuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, Beijing, China.
Trine StubDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNPrincess Máxima Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDealing with the symptom burden of cancer diagnosis and treatment has led parents to seek different self-management strategies including Alternative and Complementary Medicine (CAM). The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis about the use and effect of CAM modalities to treat adverse effects of conventional cancer treatment among children and young adults.

methodsSix scientific research databases were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to September 2020. Included studies investigated the use of CAM to treat cancer treatment related adverse effects in children and young adults compared to controls.

resultsTwenty RCTs comprising 1,069 participants were included in this review. The included studies investigated acupuncture, mind-body therapies, supplements, and vitamins for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), oral mucositis, and anxiety among children and young adults who underwent conventional cancer treatment. Seven studies (315 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect of CAM (including acupuncture and hypnosis only) on chemotherapy-induced nausea and/or vomiting and controls was statistically significant with a standard mean difference of -0.54, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.31] I

conclusionCurrent evidence from this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that CAM, including acupuncture and hypnosis only, is effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children and young adults. More rigorous trials and long-term effects should be investigated if acupuncture and hypnosis are to be recommended for clinical use.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsChildHumansNauseaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVomitingYoung AdultAdverse effectsChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)Pediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID35366871
PMCPMC8976304
OpenAlexW4226158755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.