Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366870›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Privacy-preserving logistic regression with secret sharing.

Ali Reza Ghavamipour, Fatih Turkmen, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali Reza GhavamipourUniversity of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, Groningen, Netherlands. a.r.ghavamipour@rug.nl.
Fatih TurkmenUniversity of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, Groningen, Netherlands.
Xiaoqian JiangUTHealth School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLogistic regression (LR) is a widely used classification method for modeling binary outcomes in many medical data classification tasks. Researchers that collect and combine datasets from various data custodians and jurisdictions can greatly benefit from the increased statistical power to support their analysis goals. However, combining data from different sources creates serious privacy concerns that need to be addressed.

methodsIn this paper, we propose two privacy-preserving protocols for performing logistic regression with the Newton-Raphson method in the estimation of parameters. Our proposals are based on secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) and tailored to the honest majority and dishonest majority security settings.

resultsThe proposed protocols are evaluated against both synthetic and real-world datasets in terms of efficiency and accuracy, and a comparison is made with the ordinary logistic regression. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed protocols are highly efficient and accurate.

conclusionsOur work introduces two iterative algorithms to enable the distributed training of a logistic regression model in a privacy-preserving manner. The implementation results show that our algorithms can handle large datasets from multiple sources.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrivacyHumansLogistic ModelsLogistic regressionMulti-party computationNewton–RaphsonPrivacy-preservingSecret sharing

Identifiers

PMID35366870
PMCPMC8977014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.