ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Privacy-preserving logistic regression with secret sharing.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing a prediction model for delayed wound healing after gastric cancer radical surgery based on three machine learning algorithms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- 21st century (clinical) decision support in nursing and allied healthcare. Developing a learning health system: a reasoned design of a theoretical framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLogistic regression (LR) is a widely used classification method for modeling binary outcomes in many medical data classification tasks. Researchers that collect and combine datasets from various data custodians and jurisdictions can greatly benefit from the increased statistical power to support their analysis goals. However, combining data from different sources creates serious privacy concerns that need to be addressed.
methodsIn this paper, we propose two privacy-preserving protocols for performing logistic regression with the Newton-Raphson method in the estimation of parameters. Our proposals are based on secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) and tailored to the honest majority and dishonest majority security settings.
resultsThe proposed protocols are evaluated against both synthetic and real-world datasets in terms of efficiency and accuracy, and a comparison is made with the ordinary logistic regression. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed protocols are highly efficient and accurate.
conclusionsOur work introduces two iterative algorithms to enable the distributed training of a logistic regression model in a privacy-preserving manner. The implementation results show that our algorithms can handle large datasets from multiple sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.