Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366862›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues.

Diantha Soemantri, Ardi Findyartini, Sophie Yolanda, Emma Morley, Fiona Patterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diantha SoemantriDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. diantha.soemantri@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-1265
Ardi FindyartiniDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-3994
Sophie YolandaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9726-7067
Emma MorleyWork Psychology Group, Derby, UK.
Fiona PattersonWork Psychology Group, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-130X
University of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, medical selection relies heavily on prior academic attainment which has an adverse impact on the diversity of selected students. Since non-academic attributes are also important, this study aims to evaluate the use of a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) for selection and the impact on student diversity relating to gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Previous SJT research has almost entirely originated from a Western context and this study focuses on new evidence in a South East Asian context with a different demographic profile.

methodsThirty faculty members developed 112 SJT scenarios assessing professionalism, communication and self-awareness domains. The scenarios underwent a concordance stage where stakeholder input was sought on the content appropriateness, to define the item scoring key, followed by an initial psychometric evaluation with first and second year medical students (N = 436). Based on these results, 30 scenarios, consisting of 128 nested items, were selected for pilot testing and evaluation regarding diversity issues with two cohorts of applicants in 2017 (N = 446) and 2018 (N = 508).

resultsThe SJT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.80 and 0.81 respectively). There were significant differences in SJT scores based on gender in both years, where females consistently outperformed males (p = .0001). However, no significant differences were found based on high school origin, parental educational background or ethnicity.

conclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate the use of an SJT in Indonesia, which has a unique diversity profile compared to Western countries. Largely, the preliminary results replicate previous studies of the potential diversity benefits of using an SJT as a tool for medical student selection and has the potential to level the playing field regarding socio-economic status and ethnicity. Further studies exploring more variables representing diversity are warranted to confirm the early results in this study.

Indexed as

School Admission CriteriaStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansIndonesiaJudgmentMalePsychometricsMedical studentsNon-academic attributesSelectionSituational judgment test (SJT)Undergraduate

Identifiers

PMID35366862
PMCPMC8976983
OpenAlexW4226040213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.