Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366860›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers' views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access.

Nicholas C Coombs, Duncan G Campbell, James Caringi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of virtual delivery of cancer education for patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Rural healthcare workers' well-being: A systematic review of support interventions.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SGLT2i and GLP-1RA Use in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas C CoombsSchool of Public & Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. nicholas.coombs@umontana.edu.
Duncan G CampbellDepartment of Psychology, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
James CaringiSchool of Public & Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.

Funding

Wildfires and Cardiovascular Health: Evaluating Associations and Intervention StrategiesP20GM130418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Maja Pedersen · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnsuring access to healthcare is a complex, multi-dimensional health challenge. Since the inception of the coronavirus pandemic, this challenge is more pressing. Some dimensions of access are difficult to quantify, namely characteristics that influence healthcare services to be both acceptable and appropriate. These link to a patient's acceptance of services that they are to receive and ensuring appropriate fit between services and a patient's specific healthcare needs. These dimensions of access are particularly evident in rural health systems where additional structural barriers make accessing healthcare more difficult. Thus, it is important to examine healthcare access barriers in rural-specific areas to understand their origin and implications for resolution.

methodsWe used qualitative methods and a convenience sample of healthcare providers who currently practice in the rural US state of Montana. Our sample included 12 healthcare providers from diverse training backgrounds and specialties. All were decision-makers in the development or revision of patients' treatment plans. Semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to explore barriers-appropriateness and acceptability-to healthcare access in their patient populations. Our analysis was both deductive and inductive and focused on three analytic domains: cultural considerations, patient-provider communication, and provider-provider communication. Member checks ensured credibility and trustworthiness of our findings.

resultsFive key themes emerged from analysis: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients' rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US.

conclusionsInadequate access to healthcare is an issue in the US, particularly in rural areas. Rural healthcare consumers compose a hard-to-reach patient population. Too few providers exist to meet population health needs, and fragmented communication impairs rural health systems' ability to function. These issues exacerbate the difficulty of ensuring acceptable and appropriate delivery of healthcare services, which compound all other barriers to healthcare access for rural residents. Each dimension of access must be monitored to improve patient experiences and outcomes for rural Americans.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityCommunicationHumansQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUnited StatesAccess to healthcareQualitative methodsRural health

Identifiers

PMID35366860
PMCPMC8976509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.