Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366859›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting.

Renee C Lovell, David Greenfield, George Johnson, Kathy Eljiz, Sue Amanatidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Minding the Gap: Complex Relational Trauma Survivors' Experiences Navigating Healthcare.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renee C LovellCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. Renee.Lovell@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-7393
David GreenfieldSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-6025
George JohnsonSydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-5025
Kathy EljizAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-1888
Sue AmanatidisCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-9259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex trauma is a significant public health issue with detrimental health, interpersonal and psychological impacts, which can impede client recovery and result in multiple representations. 'Trauma Informed Practice' (TIP) is an evidence-based model which ensures safe and effective services for clients and staff. This study examines health professional's use of TIP, and the motivators, enablers and barriers to implementation in a multidisciplinary setting.

methodsA mixed methods study with 24 front-line clinicians and managers within a community health setting in Australia. A purpose designed, expert validated TIP checklist was completed, followed by semi-structured focus groups. Survey data was reported using descriptive statistics. Focus group data was digitally recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.

resultsTen key factors were identified motivating, restricting or enabling TIP implementation. Seven were organisational factors including supportive and informed management, flexibility of service models, levels of service demands, resource availability, education opportunities, good client outcomes, and reporting requirements. Philosophical approach, team orientation, and vicarious trauma/stress management were three individual professional factors. Critically, alignment in two ways was necessary for successful implementation, that is: in knowledge and understanding across organisational role levels - clinician, manager and executive; and, in professional philosophy and team orientation of individual clinicians.

conclusionProviding TIP is essential for ensuring optimum client outcomes for trauma survivors and for maintaining workforce wellbeing. Although the increasing uptake to TIP is evident within the health setting, further attention is required to address the tension between service models focused on efficiently servicing whole populations and those attuned to effectively meeting the needs of high risk groups. A complex strategy to unite therapeutic and managerial goals is necessary if client, professional and organisational needs are to be effectively met.

Indexed as

Public HealthSurvivorsAustraliaCounselingFocus GroupsHumansCommunity healthComplex traumaHealthcareMultidisciplinaryTrauma informedWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35366859
PMCPMC8975732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.