Trial reportBMC medical education2022
Effectiveness of seminar-case learning for use in practice teaching of statistics for undergraduates majoring in preventive medicine: a prospective cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing the seminar-case learning and lecture-based learning models in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Distinct learner profiles of attitudes toward biostatistics in medical education: a latent profile analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Implementing and evaluating a seminar-case learning model in postgraduate orthodontic education: perceived effectiveness, student experience, and influencing factors.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Active Learning in Biostatistics Education for Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- A systematic seminar-based model improves learning and research competence in an immunology graduate course: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Investigation and implementation of case-based learning in the sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The Preparation of Future Statistically Oriented Physicians: A Single-Center Experience in Saudi Arabia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe seminar-case learning (SCL) method is a case-oriented teaching model, with teachers and students as the main body of teaching, characterized by communication, interaction, and mutual inspiration. This study explored the effects of the SCL method versus traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) in the statistics curriculum for undergraduate students majoring in preventive medicine. Research questions were: 1) whether the scores of students in the experimental group (the SCL model) were higher than those in the control group (the LBL model); 2) whether the students' satisfaction in the experimental group was better than that in the control group; and 3) whether the self-report benefit of students in the experimental group was better than that in the control group.
methodsWe conducted a two-armed cluster-randomized education intervention trial in practice teaching of health statistics among undergraduates majoring in preventive medicine. Two administrative classes (classes 1-4 and classes 5-8) were divided into the experimental group and the control group according to the principle of drawing lots. The students in two groups received the same statistical theory course. For the arrangement of statistical practice course, the experimental group adopted the SCL model, and the control group used the LBL model. The teaching effect was evaluated via an examination and an anonymous questionnaire survey.
resultsScores for noun explanation questions in the experimental group showed no statistical significance with that of the control group(U = 2911.0, P = 0.964). The scores of single choice, calculation, and case analysis questions, and the total scores were significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Students' satisfaction with arrangements of the practice course in the experimental group (92.41%) was significantly higher than that of in the control group (77.03%), the difference was statistically significant (χ
conclusionAs an effective method of high-quality education, the SCL model is worthy of further promotion in the practice teaching of preventive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.