Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366848›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2022

Feasibility, acceptability, and short-term impact of a brief sexually transmitted infection intervention targeting U.S. Military personnel and family members.

Anjali Kunz, Amber Moodley, Donn J Colby, Michele Soltis, Wesley Robb-McGrath, Alexandra Fairchok, Paul Faestel, Amanda Jungels, Alexis A Bender, Edwin Kamau and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04547413 (Prospective Cohort Trial To Assess Acceptability and Efficacy of an Adapted STI/HIV Intervention Behavioral Intervention Program in a Population of US Army Personnel and Their Medical Beneficiaries - Execution Phase), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04547413 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Cohort Trial To Assess Acceptability and Efficacy of an Adapted STI/HIV Intervention Behavioral Intervention Program in a Population of US Army Personnel and Their Medical Beneficiaries - Execution Phase

TypeinterventionalSponsorMadigan Army Medical CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled155ConditionsSexually Transmitted InfectionsArmsSTI/HIV Intervention Behavioral Intervention Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Anjali KunzMadigan Army Medical Center, Joint-Base Lewis McChord, Tacoma, WA, US.
Amber MoodleyHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, US.
Donn J ColbyHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, US. dcolby@hivresearch.org.
Michele SoltisMadigan Army Medical Center, Joint-Base Lewis McChord, Tacoma, WA, US.
Wesley Robb-McGrathHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, US.
Alexandra FairchokHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, US.
Paul FaestelMadigan Army Medical Center, Joint-Base Lewis McChord, Tacoma, WA, US.
Amanda JungelsBehavioral and Social Health Outcomes Program, Army Public Health Center, Edgewood, MD, US.
Alexis A BenderBehavioral and Social Health Outcomes Program, Army Public Health Center, Edgewood, MD, US.
Edwin KamauUnited States Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, US.
Gina WingoodColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, US.
Ralph DiClementeNew York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, US.
Paul ScottEmerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, US.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USColumbia University · USNew York University · USUniversity School · USU.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past 10 years, incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has increased to record numbers in the United States, with the most significant increases observed among adolescents and young adults. The US military, where the majority of active duty personnel are 18-30 years old, has seen similar increases. However, the US military does not yet have a standardized, service-wide program for STI education and prevention.

methodsThe KISS intervention (Knocking out Infections through Safer-sex and Screening) was adapted from an evidence-based intervention endorsed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and consisted of a one-time, small group session. Content included STI/HIV knowledge and prevention, condom use skills, and interpersonal communication techniques. The intervention was pilot tested for feasibility and acceptability among a population of service members and medical beneficiaries at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state.

resultsA total of 79 participants aged 18-30 years were consented to participate in the pilot study and met entry criteria, 66/79 (82.5%) attended the intervention session, and 46/66 (69.7%) returned at 3 months for the final follow-up assessment. The intervention sessions included 31 male (47.0%) and 35 female (53.0%) participants. Almost all participants felt comfortable discussing sexual issues in the group sessions, reported that they intended to practice safer sex after the intervention, and would also recommend the intervention to friends. Knowledge about STI/HIV prevention significantly increased after the intervention, and intervention effects were maintained at 3 months. About one-fifth of participants tested positive for N. gonorrhea or C. trachomatis infection at enrollment, while none had recurrent STIs at the final visit. Use of both male and female condoms increased after the intervention.

conclusionsThe KISS intervention was feasible to implement in the military setting and was acceptable to the active duty service members and other medical beneficiaries who participated in the pilot project. Further studies are needed to determine if the KISS intervention, or others, effectively decrease STI incidence in active duty personnel and would be appropriate for more widespread implementation.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered as the pilot phase of clinicaltrials.gov NCT04547413 , "Prospective Cohort Trial to Assess Acceptability and Efficacy of an Adapted STI/HIV Intervention Behavioral Intervention Program in a Population of US Army Personnel and Their Medical Beneficiaries-Execution Phase."

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMilitary PersonnelSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultFamilyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultEvidence-based interventionsHuman immunodeficiency virusMilitaryPreventionSexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID35366848
PMCPMC8977033
OpenAlexW4223570668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.