Observational studyBMC nephrology2022
Clinical value of serum cholinesterase levels in Nephrotic syndrome: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fractional excretion of total protein predicts renal prognosis in Japanese patients with primary membranous nephropathy.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Cholinesterase is a Potential Biomarker with High Accuracy for the Nephrotic Syndrome Diagnosis in Minors.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNephrotic syndrome (NS) results in massive proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia, which are responsible for a compensatory increase in protein synthesis in the liver. Serum cholinesterase (ChE) also increases in NS. However, its clinical value is not fully elucidated.
methodsIn this study, 184 patients with NS who underwent kidney biopsy were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to serum ChE levels, as follows: hypercholinesterasemia (HC) and non-hypercholinesterasemia (NHC) groups. The clinical factors were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe HC group had significantly more severe proteinuria and higher prevalence of high selective proteinuria than the NHC group. Furthermore, the prevalence of minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) was significantly higher in the HC group than that in the NHC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the severity of proteinuria and MCNS were significantly associated with HC.
conclusionIn this study, HC in NS was associated with the severity of proteinuria and MCNS, and could help clinicians predict the histological diagnosis of NS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.