Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366802›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2022

Observational study on chest pain during the Covid-19 pandemic: changes and characteristics of visits to a Norwegian emergency department during the lockdown.

Mikkel Grande, Lars Petter Bjørnsen, Lars Eide Næss-Pleym, Lars Erik Laugsand, Bjørnar Grenne

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mikkel GrandeNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lars Petter BjørnsenClinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Lars Eide Næss-PleymClinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Lars Erik LaugsandClinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Bjørnar GrenneDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. bjornar.grenne@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-6865
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, reports emerged on decreasing emergency department (ED) visits in many countries. Patients experiencing chest pain was no exception. The aim of the current study was to describe how the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequential lockdown impacted the chest pain population in a Norwegian ED.

methodsAll patients presenting to the ED with chest pain during the study period were included. Data were collected retrospectively from the time period January 6

resultsFewer patients with chest pain were seen in the ED following the national lockdown in Norway, compared to the corresponding 2019 period (week 13: 38% fewer; weeks 11-27: 16% fewer). By week 28, the rate normalized compared to 2019 levels. There was a relative increase in lower acuity patients among these patients, while fewer moderate acuity patients were seen. During the initial period following lockdown, the median age was lower compared to the corresponding 2019 period (58 years (IQR 25) vs 62 years (IQR 24), respectively). Admissions due to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remained proportionally stable.

conclusionsSucceeding the Covid-19 outbreak and the subsequent national lockdown in Norway, fewer chest pain patients presented to the ED. Paradoxically, the patients seemed to be less severely ill and were on average younger compared to 2019 data. However, the proportion of patients admitted with ACS was stable during this period. This could imply that some patients may have failed to seek medical advice despite experiencing a myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultChest PainCommunicable Disease ControlEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesAcute coronary syndromeChest painCovid-19Emergency servicesHospitalMyocardial infarctionNorway

Identifiers

PMID35366802
PMCPMC8976421
OpenAlexW4225726132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.