Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366293›Full record

ArticlePathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology2022

Predictors of Mortality Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients.

Vladimir Shvartz, Maria Sokolskaya, Andrey Petrosyan, Artak Ispiryan, Sergey Donakanyan, Leo Bockeria, Olga Bockeria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vladimir ShvartzDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-0376
Maria SokolskayaDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey PetrosyanDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Artak IspiryanDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey DonakanyanDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Leo BockeriaDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Olga BockeriaDepartment of Surgical Treatment for Interactive Pathology, Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Rublevskoe Shosse, 135, 121552 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 18-74-10064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding of the risk factors for the development of adverse outcomes after aortic valve replacement is necessary to develop timely preventive measures and to improve the results of surgical treatment. Methods: We analyzed patients with aortic stenosis (n = 742) who underwent surgical treatment in the period 2014−2020. The average age was 63 (57;69) years—men 58%, women 42%. Results: The hospital mortality rate was 3% (22 patients). The following statistically significant threshold values (cut-off points) were obtained in the ROC analysis: aortic cross-clamp time > 93 min AUC (CI) 0.676 (0.640−0.710), p = 0.010; cardiopulmonary bypass time > 144 min AUC (CI) 0.809 (0.778−0.837), p < 0.0001, hemoglobin before op <120 g/L. AUC (CI) 0.762 (0.728−0.793), p < 0.0001, hematocrit before op <39% AUC (CI) 0.755 (0.721−0.786), p < 0.001, end-diastolic dimension index >2.39 AUC (CI) 0.647 (0.607−0.686), p = 0.014, end-systolic dimension index > 1.68 AUC (CI) 0.657 (0.617−0.695), p = 0.009. Statistically significant independent predictors of hospital mortality were identified: BMI > 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.84; CI 1.15−7.01), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.65; CI 1.01−13.2), diabetes (OR 3.88; CI 1.38−10.9), frequent ventricular ectopy before operation (OR 9.78; CI 1.91−50.2), mitral valve repair (OR 4.47; CI 1.76−11.3), tricuspid valve repair (OR 3.06; CI 1.09−8.58), 3 and more procedures (OR 4.44; CI 1.67−11.8). Conclusions: The hospital mortality rate was 3%. The main indicators associated with the risk of death were: diabetes, overweight (body mass index more than 30 kg/m2), frequent ventricular ectopy before surgery, hemoglobin level below 120 g/L, hematocrit level below 39%, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, additional mitral and tricuspid valve interventions.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisaortic valve replacementpredictors of adverse outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35366293
PMCPMC8955830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.