Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366285›Full record

ReviewPathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology2021

Corneal Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Small Fiber Neuropathy: Faster, Easier, and More Efficient Than Skin Biopsy?

Mariia V Lukashenko, Natalia Y Gavrilova, Anna V Bregovskaya, Lidiia A Soprun, Leonid P Churilov, Ioannis N Petropoulos, Rayaz A Malik, Yehuda Shoenfeld

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Scleritis and episcleritis in patients with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariia V LukashenkoLaboratory Mosaic Autoimmunity, St. Petersburg State University, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia Y GavrilovaLaboratory Mosaic Autoimmunity, St. Petersburg State University, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Anna V BregovskayaDepartment of endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1679-4565
Lidiia A SoprunLaboratory Mosaic Autoimmunity, St. Petersburg State University, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-0418
Leonid P ChurilovLaboratory Mosaic Autoimmunity, St. Petersburg State University, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-0026
Ioannis N PetropoulosDepartment of Medicine, Research Division, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha 24144, Qatar.
Rayaz A MalikDepartment of Medicine, Research Division, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha 24144, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-8903
Yehuda ShoenfeldLaboratory Mosaic Autoimmunity, St. Petersburg State University, 199304 St. Petersburg, Russia.
St Petersburg University · RUWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QAFederal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

The Government of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021 dated September 29, 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain may affect 30-50% of the world's population and an important cause is small fiber neuropathy (SFN). Recent research suggests that autoimmune diseases may be one of the most common causes of small nerve fiber damage. There is low awareness of SFN among patients and clinicians and it is difficult to diagnose as routine electrophysiological methods only detect large fiber abnormalities, and specialized small fiber tests, like skin biopsy and quantitative sensory testing, are not routinely available. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible method for quantifying small nerve fiber degeneration and regeneration, and could be an important tool for diagnosing SFN. This review considers the advantages and disadvantages of CCM and highlights the evolution of this technique from a research tool to a diagnostic test for small fiber damage, which can be a valuable contribution to the study and management of autoimmune disease.

Indexed as

autoimmune neuropathiesautoimmunityconfocal microscopy (CM)corneasarcoidosisSjogren’s syndromeskin biopsysmall fiber neuropathy (SFN)

Identifiers

PMID35366285
PMCPMC8954271
OpenAlexW4200432549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.